Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maria S
I think most people can see through Hillary's trip to Afghanistan. Most people know that Queen Hillary could care less about the troops.
2 posted on 12/02/2003 5:27:50 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Destructor
Democrats are really placing our troops in danger. If I was of the Bathists, I would never give in until after the election to see if Bush could be defeated and a "friendlier and kinder" administration is installed. If this subject is broached, the Democrats huff and puff and say they are not putting our troops at risk and they are being "patriotic" by invoking their right to say anything they wish. I want to remind them, you can call a camel a horse but when all is said and done, it remains a camel! Their rhetoric is a camel and not a horse!
3 posted on 12/02/2003 5:36:44 AM PST by AZFolks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Destructor
Jim Mikeleshiewski (sp.?), NBC Pentagon coverer, was just on Imus & said that his contacts within the Pentagon told him that they thought Her Highness Ms. Rodham was bold & was relating what soldiers (officers/NCOs/Enlisted) told her of the shortcomings in skill field mix (e.g., need for policemen & civil affairs types versus infantry/tankers). They thought (sayed Mikeleschiewski - no wonder Tom Bwwokaw has so much trouble saying his name - lucky he is not the meteowwowwoligist) Hil was brave and right-on in saying what she did. Need to rethink this? Could it be she was being honest rather than fully political? Doesn't seem possible.
5 posted on 12/02/2003 5:55:44 AM PST by NutmegDevil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson