To: Maria S
I think most people can see through Hillary's trip to Afghanistan. Most people know that Queen Hillary could care less about the troops.
To: Destructor
Democrats are really placing our troops in danger. If I was of the Bathists, I would never give in until after the election to see if Bush could be defeated and a "friendlier and kinder" administration is installed. If this subject is broached, the Democrats huff and puff and say they are not putting our troops at risk and they are being "patriotic" by invoking their right to say anything they wish. I want to remind them, you can call a camel a horse but when all is said and done, it remains a camel! Their rhetoric is a camel and not a horse!
3 posted on
12/02/2003 5:36:44 AM PST by
AZFolks
To: Destructor
Jim Mikeleshiewski (sp.?), NBC Pentagon coverer, was just on Imus & said that his contacts within the Pentagon told him that they thought Her Highness Ms. Rodham was bold & was relating what soldiers (officers/NCOs/Enlisted) told her of the shortcomings in skill field mix (e.g., need for policemen & civil affairs types versus infantry/tankers). They thought (sayed Mikeleschiewski - no wonder Tom Bwwokaw has so much trouble saying his name - lucky he is not the meteowwowwoligist) Hil was brave and right-on in saying what she did. Need to rethink this? Could it be she was being honest rather than fully political? Doesn't seem possible.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson