To: hchutch
Ironically, the previous post PROVES the point Mr. Kling is making. The level of enforcement demanded by some people of our immigration laws would not be tolerated by the majority of people in this country. The only people who would not tolerate requiring passports for employment are libertarian nutjobs who make up 0.001% of the population.
To: traditionalist
Oh, let's see how the average guy likes having to stand in line for a government document he must keep up to date, or he cannot get a job? Oh, and what else will be requried on the passports?
I'm sorry, but that type of approach belongs in Dzerzhinsky Square, NOT the United States of America. I would not tolerate having to produce that passport. They were intended for use in foreign travel - not for domestic travel.
24 posted on
12/02/2003 3:28:44 PM PST by
hchutch
("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
To: traditionalist
The only people who would not tolerate requiring passports for employment are libertarian nutjobs who make up 0.001% of the population.
Count me among them, I guess. I'm of the opinion that it's perfectly possible to get Illegals to deport themselves without imposing burdens on law-abiding Americans. If that makes me a libertarian nut-job, so be it. I want to inconvenience Illegals, not citizens and legal residents.
|
96 posted on
12/03/2003 12:04:05 PM PST by
Sabertooth
(Credit where it's due: saveourlicense.com prevented SB60, and the Illegal Alien CDLs... for now.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson