Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NutCrackerBoy
Now that you put it that way, okay.

But why does that mean that the government should be involved in defining the meaning of a marriage contract?
533 posted on 12/12/2003 3:38:42 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel
We The People, through our representatives, enact laws to curb antisocial behavior. Leaving certain behaviors unregulated can sometimes be better, but too often invites the rule of vigilantes instead of the rule of law.

Here's an example. Left untouched by law, men are apt to abandon their women and children when the notion strikes them. Since law is required to thus regulate marriage, then a definition is required for what constitutes marriage.

534 posted on 12/12/2003 10:25:30 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson