[Chummy]

You may not have read my other postings: I've tried to portray this debate from a vantage that does not consider the view of Scripture, instead focusing from a scientific view of the results of a homosexual act.

The relevant or fair comparison can only be the question if oral sex is practiced by a number of individuals in a society to the point in which reproductive sex is precluded, and then determining the result of this behavior. What impact has this on the genetic line of the individuals engaged in the behavior? What impact has this on the society in which the individuals are living participants?

[Violette]

People don't marry in order to have children. A homosexual couple can reproduce, they just can't reproduce through their act of love making. An infertal couple is faced with the same dilemma.

When a couple is in love with one another and they become intimate, they want to express how they feel to one another. If she is on the pill or he wearing a condom, they are engaging in a form of expression of love, not an act of reproduction. A homosexual couple is engaging in an act of love as well.

When they are ready for offspring, then they will use whatever is available to them. Find a surrogate mother. Seek out a sperm doner and have invitro fertilization. Homosexuality among humans is not a threat to the reproduction of our species.