The goal is to win the debate, not to tell the truth. To win, the debater must appeal to logic and the basic assumptions of the judges.
I understand and do not object to your use of the word Sodomite. But the Biblical term does not have an applicable definition suitable for secular discourse.
Your descriptions of various sex acts in terms of outlets and plugs are very clear, but you have not stated how they are logically connected to the debate question. I doubt whether they can be connected in a way that will gain traction.
Homosexual behaviors, like others, do have risks, and I don't object to these risks being used as a debate point. The term deathstyle, though is an exaggeration.
That is what society has allowed to happen and that is why the Sodomites, who by the way are recruiting our sons & daughters into their deathstyle, are winning the hearts & minds of the children. They have to do this in order to have sex partners that are "young & fresh".
This was not brought out in your original post, so I will not address it.
Ps---nutcrackerboy---interesting name for a person in a thread about Sodomites---any meaning to this?
No.
However, it does have an applicable non-Biblical meaning when not capitalized.