Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar
Your reasoning makes a lot of sense which is why I agree with it.
However, the most strident opponents of gay "unions" oppose them for religious reasons-their scripture tells them that homosexuality is immoral and that, for them, is that.
Any other reason they may use-health, family stability,tradition is really just a cover for a religious agenda
102 posted on 12/01/2003 9:48:17 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: WackyKat
Any other reason they may use-health, family stability,tradition is really just a cover for a religious agenda

As someone who does not believe the government should sanction gay unions, I will readily admit that religious belief is the underpinning.

However, I believe that God's laws were designed not to deprive us of pleasure, but to protect us from dangers, seen and unseen. Thus it to our mutual benefit for all of us to obey his teachings, even those who do not believe.

Of course, this must be balanced against the notion of freedom. Indeed, Jesus says that he will convict the world of sin because they do not believe in Me; so apparently, his priority is faith first, then behavior. And Paul informs us that we should indeed judge fellow believers more strictly on moral issues than non-believers. So there is a case to be made that the Bible does assume a certain civil freedom that we Christians should not necessary indulge in.

Nevertheless, I find it reasonable that our beliefs at least contribute to our opinions about what should be codified in law.

109 posted on 12/01/2003 10:00:32 PM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson