To: AntiGuv
I think I'll wait until at least one court interprets Lawrence v Texas as requiring gay marriage before I worry about any court finding in Lawrence a right to multiple, simultaneous marriages.Short wait, the Mass SJC did just that.
37 posted on
12/01/2003 5:30:59 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
The Mass SJC ruled on the basis of state law, not federal law. You didn't really think I'd overlook something so obvious, did you?
41 posted on
12/01/2003 5:35:42 PM PST by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson