Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/01/2003 10:11:54 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...
Ping
2 posted on 12/01/2003 10:12:27 AM PST by knighthawk (And for the name of peace, we will prevail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Drivers using cell phones kill more people every year than the terrorists killed when they flew two planes into the World Trade Center. Drunk drivers kill about five times as many. Yet our society tolerates it.
3 posted on 12/01/2003 10:18:27 AM PST by JoeFromCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Oh, can the DUI hysterics. 1.6 million people are arrested annually in the U.S. for DUI. With the 0.08 BAC laws, this is bound to increase, and ruin the lives of a large number of social drinkers who pose no threat to other drivers. Many serve mandatory minimum prison sentences, lose jobs because of transportation problems, and are bankrupted by fines and lawyer's fees - and it often stems from a conviction for a crime of being less impaired than the average cell phone user, or a mother with an unruly child.

This is not to condone real drunken drivers -- at BAC 0.14 and above, the level of fatalities in alcohol-related crashes jumps dramatically. We don't need to become a police state to catch those guys - better police work and more awareness will do just fine. 0.08 BAC laws are simply a precursor to MADD's real agenda: VIRTUAL PROHIBITION.

4 posted on 12/01/2003 10:24:52 AM PST by bassmaner (Let's take the word "liberal" back from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
The burden would then be where it belonged: on the shoulders of the person who endangered everyone who came close to his 2-ton, out-of-control deadly weapon.

Yeah, good idea. Toss out presumed innocence for the drinkers of the world.

It seems the "rule of two" makes perfect sense. If I'm not drunk and I accidentally kill someone, I'm not arrested and tried for killing them.

The prohibitionists have done a good job at creating social taboos against drunk driving. Honestly. It's not a good thing to do, and it can be a deadly activity. But creating the opportunity for unjust prosecutions is going too far.

9 posted on 12/01/2003 10:44:17 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
The state which elected Hillary.
12 posted on 12/01/2003 10:51:00 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Save a Life, Change the Law, starting with drunken drivers.

Perhaps Ted Kennedy could champion a law such as this . He could start by turning himself in.

13 posted on 12/01/2003 10:51:10 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Punish drunks and dopers that kill behind the wheel!
14 posted on 12/01/2003 10:52:58 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson