[Pyro7480]

Did you see this blurb in the .pdf?

ELK GROVE SCH. DIST. V. NEWDOW, MICHAEL A., ET AL

The motion of respondent Michael A. Newdow for representation pro se, or (in the alternative) pro hac vice is granted. The motion of Americans United for Separation of Church and State for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time to present argument is denied. Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

[woerm]

quote:
Did you see this blurb in the .pdf?

ELK GROVE SCH. DIST. V. NEWDOW, MICHAEL A., ET AL


The motion of respondent Michael A. Newdow for representation pro se, or (in the alternative) pro hac vice is granted

Pyro,
yup, I saw and was disgusted...

get a new attorney asap,they can't wait to get to the further follies of the First ammendment but don't bother them with the second or the 4th or the 5th, 8th, hell, none of the bill or rights or the 14th matters to them apparently.

r