To: woerm
Did you see this blurb in the .pdf?
ELK GROVE SCH. DIST. V. NEWDOW, MICHAEL A., ET AL
The motion of respondent Michael A. Newdow for representation pro se, or (in the alternative) pro hac vice is granted. The motion of Americans United for Separation of Church and State for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time to present argument is denied. Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
13 posted on
12/01/2003 8:38:29 AM PST by
Pyro7480
("We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid" - Benjamin Franklin)
To: Pyro7480
quote:
Did you see this blurb in the .pdf?
ELK GROVE SCH. DIST. V. NEWDOW, MICHAEL A., ET AL
The motion of respondent Michael A. Newdow for representation pro se, or (in the alternative) pro hac vice is granted
Pyro,
yup, I saw and was disgusted...
get a new attorney asap,they can't wait to get to the further follies of the First ammendment but don't bother them with the second or the 4th or the 5th, 8th, hell, none of the bill or rights or the 14th matters to them apparently.
r
81 posted on
12/01/2003 1:27:07 PM PST by
woerm
(student of history)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson