Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Charge NASA with Implementing Broad Space Vision to Dominate Cislunar Space
Spaceref via NASA watch ^ | November 30, 2003 | Frank Sietzen, Jr.

Posted on 12/01/2003 1:36:09 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush will propose a sweeping new vision of U.S. space leadership that will call for use of the Moon for technology development and partnerships between NASA and the Defense Department to make maximum use of existing or planned U.S. space systems, this column has learned from informed sources.

NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe will be tasked with leading the effort, aimed at presenting Vice President Dick Cheney and the president with a roadmap to what some are calling "renewed U.S. space dominance" during 2004.

Following a year-long review of U.S. space objectives, programs, and assets, the Bush administration was presented with a broad set of options during the summer's deliberations, a source indicated.

O'Keefe "worked to build a consensus" for renewed U.S. manned spaceflight beyond shuttle and station. The return to the Moon by U.S. astronauts possibly by the end of the next decade became "by default" the least expensive and risky of the paths proposed for the U.S. space program.

Bush will call for renewed U.S. activities leading to leadership of space exploration "in the Earth-Moon system" that could include manned lunar landings, the employment of a series of commercially-available launch vehicles and upper stages, new robotic lunar probes that will include orbiting communications and navigation relay satellites, and the development of a "flexible" manned spacecraft that is likely to be a form of the proposed Orbital Space Plane, but no new advanced launchers, large Apollo-style space vehicles or reusable replacements for the shuttles. Creation of a manned lunar base would evolve from more limited landings, if at all.

Development of new, advanced space technologies that would reinvigorate the space program and industry has been more of a focus of the effort than the use of the Moon itself, the source said. Military use of space and military test beds were also key elements in gaining acceptance of the renewed space plan. Testing of the Prometheus atomic rocket would also be a part of the plan.

The existing space shuttle fleet will play a crucial role in the plan by use of its heavy lifting capabilities in an unmanned form. Use of the existing U.S. expendable Delta and Atlas fleet as well as the remaining three shuttles was mandated early on, the source indicated. Part of this exercise has also been a parallel effort to arrive at a retirement date for the shuttle. That had yet to be agreed upon, this column has been told.

NASA's budget will annually rise "no more" than seven percent, beginning in 2006, according to the source. This excludes the cost of the OSP and the shuttle's return to flight. Less than $250 million in new funding will be allocated in FY2005 for the space dominance implementation plan.

A series of options studied this summer that could free up agency funding for the manned initiative included NASA ending whole areas of existing unrelated work and transferring the programs to other federal agencies. The study included ending NASA-funded aeronautics research, and earth science programs. But it was not clear if these transfers would be attempted as part of a reorganization of the space agency that was set in motion by the Columbia accident as well as the Bush space vision exercise, or delayed until after the 2004 Presidential Election.

The idea was considered so controversial that many thought it would never go beyond the study phase.

O'Keefe's view of the idea was also not clear. But other elements of the reorganization are going ahead, including creation of a new "Code X" at NASA headquarters to administer the exploration package, and a streamlining of operational codes and responsibilities. Space Architect Gary Martin would be a part of but would not lead the new exploration office, whose head is expected to be a former admiral.

As this column goes to press, the source, not affiliated with the current U.S. space industry or agencies, indicated that eventual success in reaching a broad enough goal to gain political support within the administration was mostly the work of O'Keefe, and a small group of other Bush administration appointees and advisors. "Some were dubious that he (O'Keefe) could be a statesman, but look what has happened," the source said.

"For someone without a space background, he did good, keeping people's feet to the fire. He clearly wants (the new vision) this to happen." "But they are still tinkering with what's in there, and nobody knows at all." There was-and still is-significant opposition to the effort, the source said.

In the end, however, O'Keefe allegedly spent as much time gathering support within NASA itself as he did within the U.S. military, which continues to be skeptical about a new NASA-led manned program. "In a way he had to drag his own agency along to put up, or shut it. It was a close run thing, and still isn't a done deal" this column was told.

Once the Bush White House chooses a venue for the announcement, attention will shift to NASA for the crafting of the implementation plan and the chronology. Some of this has already been assembled, allegedly and quietly, by O'Keefe working with a handful of NASA planners. Other elements will depend on how much of the final proposed vision actually gets into form by the White House.

Support for any NASA-run manned space program was not uniform within the administration, the source complained. "But in the end he got most of them on board, and that's what counts." But when asked if the new space vision announcement is a certainty, the source joked. "In this White House, the only thing certain is they hate leaks."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lunar; moon; nasa; nationalsecurity; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Taking issue with some of the report (part of the seen this before, nothing came of it)

"O'Keefe's view of the idea was also not clear. But other elements of the reorganization are going ahead, including creation of a new "Code X" at NASA headquarters to administer the exploration package"

Reality is that NASA had an office called CODE Z that contained future studies of possible architectures using existing hardware to do deep space missions. The office was dismantled during the Clinton Admin by Goldin.


"and a streamlining of operational codes and responsibilities. Space Architect Gary Martin would be a part of but would not lead the new exploration office, whose head is expected to be a former admiral."

An ADMIRAL?

What the "F" does a Navy guy know about USAF projects?

If the White House is calling for NASA and the military to come together, DO NOT PUT US Navy brass in charge of the USAF space effort.

WATCHING VERY CAREFULLY!
21 posted on 12/01/2003 7:47:50 AM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
The mission will establish a foothold on the Moon and command the high ground. The Helium 3 theory can be tested, while we're mining rocket fuel and setting up telescopes.
22 posted on 12/01/2003 7:50:48 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
What the "F" does a Navy guy know about USAF projects?

They did pretty well with Clementine.

Clementine's twin is hanging in the Air and Space Museum.

23 posted on 12/01/2003 7:57:07 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
It's nice to know changes are being discussed.
24 posted on 12/01/2003 8:00:03 AM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Anything that hasn't flown and is hanging in the NASM was a waste of money.

That Skylab II second module should have flown into orbit, instead it's a three story walk-thru exhibit at the NASM.

NO Navy Admiral belongs in charge of anything at NASA (Richard Truly excepted).
25 posted on 12/01/2003 8:01:23 AM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: July 4th
As Rohrbacher said, it's not a change... it's the same old thinking and same old policy.

NASA needs to be significantly altered in mission, scope, and objectives.
27 posted on 12/01/2003 8:02:21 AM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
A waste? From Post #13.

(6) Hydrogen, probably in the form of water ice, exists at the poles of the Moon that can be extracted and processed into rocket propellant and life-support consumables The joint DoD-NASA Clementine mission was flown in 1994. Designed to test sensors developed for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), Clementine was an amazing success story. This small spacecraft was designed, built, and flown within the short time span of 24 months for a total cost of about $150 M (FY 2003 dollars), including the launch vehicle. Clementine made global maps of the mineral and elemental content of the Moon, mapped the shape and topography of its surface with laser altimetry, and gave us our first good look at the intriguing and unique polar regions of the Moon. Clementine did not carry instruments specifically designed to look for water at the poles, but an ingenious improvisation used the spacecraft communications antenna to beam radio waves into the polar regions; radio echoes were observed using the Deep Space Network dishes. Results indicated that material with reflection characteristics similar to ice are found in the permanently dark areas near the south pole. This major discovery was subsequently confirmed by a different experiment flown on NASA's Lunar Prospector spacecraft four years later in 1998.

28 posted on 12/01/2003 8:08:19 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Bump!
29 posted on 12/01/2003 8:08:55 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
The buzz is an announcement is close at hand.
30 posted on 12/01/2003 8:09:39 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
YES... a waste of money...
if it didn't fly and it's hanging in the NASM, it didn't achieve it's primary mission.

That's a waste of money.

31 posted on 12/01/2003 8:09:48 AM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"the Moon where we will learn how to live off planet, use it's resources, tighten up our national defense and protect our space assets. "

At least.

Absent a miraculous breakthrough in propulsion, fuels and foods produced on the moon are the only affordable means of exploring and settling space.

We won't know if we can do that until we try, but there is no reason to think we can't.


ISS: "Gas, Food and Lodging"

32 posted on 12/01/2003 8:10:11 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I didn't see pinged to this yet.
33 posted on 12/01/2003 8:12:09 AM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Clemenine II was Bill Clinton's first line item veto. By the time the line item veto was ditched, money for the mission was spent elsewhere.
34 posted on 12/01/2003 8:12:30 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Clemenine II - Clementine II
35 posted on 12/01/2003 8:13:14 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
We won't know if we can do that until we try, but there is no reason to think we can't.

If we think we can't, things can only get worse. We can and we will!

36 posted on 12/01/2003 8:15:19 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Bush will call for renewed U.S. activities leading to leadership of space exploration "in the Earth-Moon system" that could include manned lunar landings, the employment of a series of commercially-available launch vehicles and upper stages, new robotic lunar probes that will include orbiting communications and navigation relay satellites, and the development of a "flexible" manned spacecraft that is likely to be a form of the proposed Orbital Space Plane, but no new advanced launchers, large Apollo-style space vehicles or reusable replacements for the shuttles...

Without drastically reducing the cost of getting to orbit, we won't be doing anything sustainable past a couple of elections. That is the central problem facing space exploration and it is simply being ignored. Unless someone addresses that point, everything else is just p!ssing into the wind.

37 posted on 12/01/2003 8:28:57 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
There are more than space duffers in this. Many, many more.
38 posted on 12/01/2003 8:31:23 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
Read post number 13.
39 posted on 12/01/2003 8:32:01 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The buzz is an announcement is close at hand.


Cool! Thanks for all the info.

40 posted on 12/01/2003 8:44:36 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... FRuitcake, Anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson