"Whenever our allies are killed, and we are able to determine who did it and capture those responsible, we should immediately hand them over to the country that suffered the loss. Especially South Korea."
==
Yes -- that would serve them right.
BTW -- Al Jazeera is already starting about the "innocents" killed -- the Dems are going to pick this up any minute now.
Innocents killed in Samarra bloodbath
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/E56B8E35-2484-40C5-935E-B452A2C74769.htm "But local residents said US troops killed innocent bystanders when they opened fire on anything that moved around midday."
If we did kill "innocent bystanders" -- their blood should be on the heads of the terrorists who attacked us, while innocent bystanders were around, not on our heads, for defending ourselves.
Even Al Jazeera includes in their article:
"The attackers fired rocket-propelled grenades and automatic weapons at the convoy from rooftops of buildings and from the alleyways," said MacDonald, adding that mortars and improvised bombs also were used against the US soldiers. "
What were we supposed to do, just let ourselves be massacred? Not to mention, that the terrorist attackers do not pay much attention to innocent bystanders -- and even in this case, it may well be that they killed them, not we.
Al Jazeera is already starting about the "innocents" killed -- the Dems are going to pick this up any minute now. My, that didn't take long, did it. The DNC is receiving it's talking points from it's Arab chapter I see. Changing tag lines...
Prairie
If we did kill "innocent bystanders" -- their blood should be on the heads of the terrorists who attacked us, while innocent bystanders were around, not on our heads, for defending ourselves.
Terrorists? The fact they are primarily targetting foreign troopers makes them sound like guerillas.
The deaths of innocents is always terrible. However, when our troops are under attack, they should open up with all they got. Cold - but it's the way I feel.