Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion
Point 1: It's not as bad as what the Dems would propose. I offered the differences between the Bush one and the Dem one later on in my article.

Points 2-4: That's just a bunch of theories I saw while searching for more info on FR. Not my opinions.

Thanks for your comments!




12 posted on 11/30/2003 2:00:02 PM PST by Killborn (I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Killborn
Point 1: It's not as bad as what the Dems would propose. I offered the differences between the Bush one and the Dem one later on in my article.

That appears to be the heart of your argument: "This plan is not as bad as some imagined Democrat Plan". Except the GOP is in control and you haven't demonstrated how this alternative plan would even come under consideration. You're essentially arguing that this bill is a positive only to the extent that it's better than a possible future alternative, which is practically an impossible case to make. If you want to argue that the bill has some intrinsic merit, we might be able to debate how much. But simply arguing "it's not as bad as HillaryCare" is really not a persuasive case.

14 posted on 11/30/2003 2:14:32 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson