To: carl in alaska; FairOpinion
They would have preferred that the terrorists were machine-gunned by troops under UN command. But, there would NOT have been any terrorists machine-gunned down if this op were under UN command....it would have been a repeat of the cat and mouse game played with UN "inspectors," you know, with such folks whose mentality and desires are like Scott Ritter's.
To: nicmarlo; carl in alaska
"But, there would NOT have been any terrorists machine-gunned down if this op were under UN command."
===
Exactly. I thought the original poster was being sarcastic.
The UN couldn't defend anything against a toothless, declwed pussycat, much less against any real attackers.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson