Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cannoneer No. 4
"The Transformation director and other Pentagon reformers are especially critical of the time it takes to produce weapons systems. Defense programs development cycles must be brought in line with those of commercial industry, Cebrowski said, which are typically measured in months and years - not decades."

Spoken like a perfumed prince that has no idea how complex military systems are, nor how the particular acquisition program gets delayed by too much meddling from Congress, OSD, or potshots from the other services.

"The U.S. Army's Crusader artillery program was an early casualty of the transformation initiative. The $11 billion program was cancelled last year. According to Cebrowski, any weapons program is expendable if it doesn't meet the new transformation criteria.

"(Crusader) is a legacy of industrial age warfare born to satisfy the Army's indirect fire requirements in a strategic context that no longer exists," he said. In other words, Crusader is a relic of the Cold War: too heavy, too expensive and too long in development."
So the solution is to stick the Army with a 50+ year old chassis (Paladin)? This bozo doesn't know WTF he is talking about.

"The main Crusader tracked vehicle, equipped with a 150 mm howitzer [I think they mean 155mm - Cannoneer][correct - Sauropod], requires a companion vehicle to supply it with ammunition. The two vehicles weigh in at a whopping 81 tons - a lot of hardware to haul to a battle front."

This is so much used food. What would Cebrwski suggest - piles of ammunition along the side of the road for the howitzers to use?

16 posted on 11/29/2003 8:37:35 AM PST by sauropod (I believe Tawana! Sharpton for Prez!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sauropod
They forget that even the M109A6 paladin requires a companion vehicle.
ALL artillery systems require companion vehicles of one form or another.
*snort*
You're right about them having it out for the Crusdader from the start.
19 posted on 11/29/2003 8:49:35 AM PST by Darksheare (Even as we speak, my 100,000 killer wombat army marches forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod
What would Cebrwski suggest - piles of ammunition along the side of the road for the howitzers to use?

According to the Air Force we don't need tube artillery anymore. We can just bombard and occupy, using Special Forces as body guards for ETAC's and friendly war lord troops as occupiers.

40 posted on 11/29/2003 10:39:44 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (All that is necessary for ignorance to triumph is for wise men to say nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson