Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IoCaster
"He certainly seems to be implying that he was aboard AF1 when they landed in Baghdad"

Never mentioned 747 and if he was in a Piper Cub it would still be AF-1

There is no reason that a G-5 wouldn't have the same protections as one of the 747s.

Implied=Assume=Ass U &Me.
1,942 posted on 11/30/2003 10:24:43 AM PST by dalereed (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1941 | View Replies ]


To: dalereed
Never mentioned 747 ...

I'm aware of that. That's why I phrased it the way I did.

Implied=Assume=Ass U &Me.

Implied=Niger yellowcake=16 words in SOU=Mission Accomplished=Media manipulation and tomfoolery.

You can't give those media jackals even a tiny opportunity like that.

BTW....It's not my assumptions that are of concern here. The dims and the media are the ones who have been making claims that Bush lied based on what their assumptions led them to believe he meant rather than what he's actually said in the past. They've been trying to turn the carrier landing into a liability by distorting the meaning of the mission accomplished banner. They would love to smear Bush in any way they can in an attempt to diminish the impact of his visit to the troops in Baghdad.

1,943 posted on 11/30/2003 10:55:55 AM PST by IoCaster ("That to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery." - Richard Hooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1942 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson