Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Oh let me see, you have no real reason to disagree with my assessment, so you resort to childish responses, emphasizing my assessment of you even more.
1,435 posted on 11/27/2003 6:27:05 PM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1427 | View Replies ]


To: ican'tbelieveit
I could care less of your "assessment" of anything, let alone "me".

But to perhaps clear up any prior misunderstanding, my position is that any credible communication regarding the whereabouts of GW is a security concern, particularly if the President is visiting a theater of war. This should ESPECIALLY include one of the most rapid means of modern communication -- the internet.

Now, you personally may or may not have "superior knowledge" about today's events (which I doubt, BTW), but nonetheless, I fail to understand your "beef". Security was a major concern vis a vis GW's trip, and the appropriate precautions were apparently taken.

1,466 posted on 11/27/2003 6:41:52 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("...the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1435 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson