My question was just that a question.The frequency of the "fraud" makes it no less a "fraud". The granting of benefits by a corporation does not create law. The claim for benefits based on an unverifiable behavior is what I object to.
I guess the companies have two choices: deny the benefits or force the guys to have sex with each other.
Companies have many choices as long as they do not violate law.
Of course, a man and woman would never ever marry for such venal purposes.
Transgression in one instance does not excuse transgression in the other instance.
If you claim benefits or status by declaring that you are homosexual, then be prepared to prove you are homosexual.
Why is asking for proof a problem?