[pinz-n-needlez]

>>Why should they be denied the benefits of divorce, spousal support, alimony, community property and all the other restraints imposed on heterosexuals?>>

And why should trial lawyers be denied all of the monetary fallout from arguing in court the above details surrounding the dissolution of such marriages?

I think this movement is as much about full employment of lawyers as it is about undersutting traditional conventions in our society.

Pinz

[R. Scott]

Lawyers will make money from it no matter which way it goes. If marriage is not allowed, they make money trying to sue for discrimination.

[Deep_6]

Re:
"...And why should trial lawyers be denied all of the monetary fallout
from arguing in court the above details surrounding the dissolution of such marriages?

I think this movement is as much about full employment of lawyers as it is
about undersutting traditional conventions in our society......."

Of course, we wouldn't need lawyers or court actions if Constitutional rights
weren't being denied in the first place, would we.

Divorce is on the rise among male/female unions, as it has been for several
centuries. Divorce erodes the family structure and undermines the entire
aspect of "the sanctity of marriage" as espoused by all those fighting against
the legalization of same-sex marriage. Why aren't these same people
fighting against the ease of which the Government provides divorces, if
they are so concerned about "the sanctity of marriage"?

The answer is evident.