[gcruse]

-- were we objective in the least on this issue -- we'd be using pornography as a definite marker for potential perps.

Then you'd be rounding up most every 13-year old boy you could get your hands on.
Not you, Jocko, sit down.
Come to think of it, everybody is a potential perp, anyway, so there's little point.

[Askel5]

I'm not interested in "preventive" measures to combat real crime.

I'm interested only in dispelling the notion that pornography is a morally neutral thing worth of the special protections the Supreme Court regularly accords it now that it's been Personally Interpreted to be "Free Speech" somehow.