[tpaine]

#3Fan:
Then how can the magic bullet have struck Kennedy's back at a 45 degree downward angle and then go out higher at the throat and then strike Connaly at a 39 degree downward angle?

---

You assume they were both sitting perfectly erect in their seats at a 90 degree angle. Think about the effect if one or both of JFK and Connally were not sitting perfectly erect.
Each degree variation from the vertical produces a corresponding change in the bullet path through the body.
-Tares-

---

JFK's jacket & shirt have matching holes corresponding to his back wound, indicating he was seated upright in a normal position.

Neither the Z film, nor other still photos taken at the point where he was hit, show him bent foward enough to account for the 'up' angle relative to the 6th floor window.

Nor do they show Connelly 'in line' to that same angle.

This point has been obvious since the Reports publication in '64.

The computer graphic cartoons grow more ludicrous every year in their attempts to 'prove' otherwise.
They only prove the increasing desperation of the single bullet, single shooter theorists.

[Tares]

JFK's jacket & shirt have matching holes corresponding to his back wound, indicating he was seated upright in a normal position.

The available photographic evidence also indicates Kennedy was basically upright. But have you considered The Case for a Bunched Jacket? What do you think of it?