To: DustyMoment; texasbluebell; #3Fan; justshutupandtakeit; Leatherneck_MT; tpaine; chuckwalla
The back wound was inferior to the first thoracic vertebra per the HSCA.
That wound did not penetrate beyond the first joint of the finger per the autopsists.
Thus the speculative trajectory of the Magic Bullet is moot, as its beginning was its end.
Therefore the throat wound was not its exit.
In addition, Drs. Crenshaw, Perry, Carrico, Baxter, Peters and Jones described it as small, neat, and round.
The consistent response of the Warren Commission as well as the FBI to evidence and testimony contrary to its agenda was to suppress it.
296 posted on
11/27/2003 9:35:37 PM PST by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: PhilDragoo
That [back] wound did not penetrate beyond the first joint of the finger per the autopsists. That's just as I remember reading somewhere in the testimony of some of the docs, Phil.
So there had to have been at a minimum 3 shots that hit JFK, not the 2 that are claimed by the proponents of the Official Story.
And a total of at least 5: The first one that missed. This one to his back that didn't penetrate. One to his throat that had to come at him from the front, since it didn't come through from the back. One to his head, whether from front or back.
Not to mention the one (minimum) that hit Connelly.
To: PhilDragoo
Ya know, now that I am seeing more in-depth information about the back wound, a question comes to mind relating to Kennedy's back brace. Is there any indication that the back brace in any way affected either the velocity or trajectory of the bullet?
Also, re-considering that the throat wound was an entry wound versus an exit wound, it might also explain why there was no spray of blood and tissue from the front of Kennedy's neck as the bullet exited.
To: PhilDragoo
There is so much evidence against the magic bullet, it's hopeless to support it. lol
302 posted on
11/28/2003 9:20:25 AM PST by
#3Fan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson