Replies

Dog: I am just quoting from what Nellie Connally said on TV this past weekend. I guess I trust HER word over everyone else since SHE was there. And her husband was there and he agrees with HER and both of them call the Warren Commission Report a big lie. That is what I believe. I believe what SHE says. I think it was a huge coverup. I don't think that was THE bullet at all, I think it was PLANTED in the stretcher after the fact. Get a copy of Nellie's new book. She spells it out in black and white.

I didn't see Nellie's interview last weekend, but her book was excerpted in the Houston Chronicle, which I did read, and I'm aware of her opinion, as well as John's.

You might be interested in the computer modeling which Dale Meyers did on the Zapruder film which was aired by ABC last week. Click here and then click on each of the Conclusions for a fascinating analysis of the bullets and trajectories.

Even the basic statements about Oswald's guilt have to be taken with a coupla pounds of salt.

The gun- absolute garbage; scope- absolute garbage; Oswald- poor shot but to the WC that adds up to some of the finest shooting outside of the Olympics (which has NEVER been duplicated under same conditions.) Purchased with a money order bought WHILE OSWALD WAS AT WORK. Gun mailed to name NOT AUTHORIZED to pick up mail at box. NO evidence Oswald ever picked up package, no signed receipt, no memory of clerk, nothing.

This whole thing seems clearly a setup. Why would Oswald purchase a gun through mail order to be sent to a PO Box both of which would leave a clear trail pointing to him when he could have purchased better guns more cheaply from dozens, if not hundreds, of locations in Texas with NO TRAIL to him? BTW this led to one of the first federal gun control laws since we obviously could not have assassins ordering their weapons through the mail, now could we?

No evidence that he EVER bought ammunition for it, NO other ammunition found for it. No evidence that he EVER practiced with it. Scope attached improperly so it could not be accurately sighted. Gun ordered was DIFFERENT LENGTH from gun found. NO way of getting it into TBD (it was a foot longer at its smallest disassembled length than "package" claimed claimed to have been used to bring it into the building by Official Lie.) Tests FAIL to show he fired rifle that day.

EVIDENCE shows indisputably that he was on second floor BEFORE and immediately AFTER shooting (by the first cop into the building.) NO teleportation device to get him from the sixth to second floor instantaneously has ever been found.

Now the claim is that the Magik bullet entered JC's back SIDEWAYS. This does NOT explain the slight damage to the bullet NOR how it could have caused all the wounds attributed to it.

Oswald had indicated to several people that he ADMIRED Kennedy and the statement he made after the shooting was that Kennedy's removal WOULD NOT CHANGE POLICY TOWARD CUBA.
NO INTERROGATION NOTES WERE TAKEN, NO TAPES NOTHING. Crime of Century treated like a shop lifting case.

All claims that various tests show fragments of bullets show that the shots came from the MC are false. The most that can be claimed is that the fragments came from bullets made from the same batch of metal as the reference bullets. NO slugs can be definitely attributed to that rifle (other than possibly the magik bullet.)

As you indicate there are HUGE problems with the WC Report.
Even though the Defenders of the Official Lie claim skeptics are demented, deluded, drunk, drug-addled etc., they are merely applying critical analysis to the known facts many of which do NOT support the conclusions of the Warren Report. Several of the members of the commission did NOT believe it: Hale Boggs, Richard Russell and John Sherman Cooper for example.