The facts are that many of your fellow Freepers- including Jim Robinson -actively support and admire Judge Moore's stance. The paucity of your opposing view has been shown time and again by your reposting of large blocks of text from atheist sites, in preference to addressing the points made against you. So not only is your position at odds with the overwhelming majority of Freepers, including our host, but you are not able to enunciate that position yourself. Do you still wonder why you're not taken seriously?
If I didn't answer your post it would be most likely because you didn't bring anything meaningful or insightful to the party. If your current post is any indication of your previous post, I'm sure that is the reason.
(However since that has not happened I can only assume that since I tend not to attack others personally that have an opposing view, a trait which you tend not to exhibit, do not use foul language, and try to be respectful of others, he has decided not to do such.)
Be careful, Kerb. It sounds like you are arrogating to yourself the role of arbiter of what is "meaningful" or "insightful". I do not accuse you of such unbridled arrogance, but statements like the two above point in that direction.
What's curious to me is why you would have any interest in FreeRepublic at all. Humanism is much more consistently expressed in either left-wing Marxism or right-wing Malthusian Darwinism ala Adolph Hitler than in conservatism. It has no place for absolutes, which seems to be your position about religion being an exclusively private matter.