To: Principled
My position is that
-the farmer knew about the consequences of growing pot
-his land should be siezed
To: robertpaulsen
It is my position that if he's found guilty that he should lose his farm. But the guy (somehow) was found NOT guilty. How can they keep his farm? Is there an outstanding charge not mentioned in the article?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson