Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Book, Two Very Different Covers [Krugman on defensive]
The New York Times ^ | November 23, 2003 | DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

Posted on 11/23/2003 12:00:57 PM PST by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2003 12:00:58 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dighton; general_re; finnman69; JoJo Gunn; gcruse
This self-proclaimed advocate of incivility deserves more Freeper attention.

gcruse: Note survival of "Hitler" reference in Krapman's (incivility can be fun) own paper.

2 posted on 11/23/2003 12:05:38 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Do the Leftists really want the gloves to come off?

Sure, Bill Frist & company have been doing little but lobbing softballs their way...but that can change.

I personally hope our next Republican Senate Majority Leader makes Newt Gingrich look tame. The current one isn't acting like any kind of leader with any kind of Republican majority.

3 posted on 11/23/2003 12:06:44 PM PST by Prime Choice (Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Paul Krugman is formulaic.

1. State part of an economic truism....badly.
2. Insult Bush.
3. Connect Bush's policy to the half-truism...no matter how.
4 posted on 11/23/2003 12:07:22 PM PST by Bogey78O (No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Keep in mind it was NEwt who sold out Bob Dornan.
5 posted on 11/23/2003 12:08:05 PM PST by Bogey78O (No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Keep in mind it was NEwt who sold out Bob Dornan.

That name rings a bell, but I don't remember why. : (

6 posted on 11/23/2003 12:09:14 PM PST by Prime Choice (Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Bob Dornan was the Cali rep who lost his seat by a very small margin. When they investigated it they found thousands of illegal votes. Gingrinch rolled over and didn't pursue it.
7 posted on 11/23/2003 12:10:35 PM PST by Bogey78O (No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Krugman is offended to be marketed as though he is Michael Moore..??Looks like he's playing to MM's audience in hope of raking in the same kind of bucks.He is a phony.
8 posted on 11/23/2003 12:10:56 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Bob Dornan was the Cali rep who lost his seat by a very small margin. When they investigated it they found thousands of illegal votes. Gingrinch rolled over and didn't pursue it.

Was that the one where Dornan's opponent changed her last name to Sanchez to sound more ethnic and attract the Latino vote? Yeah, that was a seriously raw deal.

Anyway, I didn't say I wanted Newt back. I said I wanted someone to lead the Republican Majority who makes Newt look tame by comparison.

9 posted on 11/23/2003 12:13:59 PM PST by Prime Choice (Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Yea, I was just suggesting that Newt wasn't too wild. He was quite tame and civil.
10 posted on 11/23/2003 12:14:54 PM PST by Bogey78O (No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
That name rings a bell...

Newt was House Majority Leader for a while during the 1990s...he got snookered by Clinton and the media so that when Clinton shut down the government, the public blamed Newt for it. He's still around and pops up on TV occasionally.

11 posted on 11/23/2003 12:16:44 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Yea, I was just suggesting that Newt wasn't too wild. He was quite tame and civil.

Maybe my memory is selectively failing or something. I remember him being a real firebrand and digging in his heels during the government shutdown over budget issues in 1995. Those were some tough times and required a tough response.

12 posted on 11/23/2003 12:19:53 PM PST by Prime Choice (Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
That name rings a bell...

Newt was House Majority Leader

Oh, I know who Newt is. I was referring to Dornan.

13 posted on 11/23/2003 12:20:50 PM PST by Prime Choice (Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Ha! This is sweet. Our media guys ought to spread word of this kooky cover far and wide. Drudge ought to put it on his page. Krugman's credibility as a mainstream voice could be damaged by the adolescent kookery of the cover.
14 posted on 11/23/2003 12:26:39 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Newt Gingrich led us to gain a record 56 seats for the Republicans in the House in 1994,gaining the majority for the first time in many,many years.He was hated and despised by the Dems.Remember "Contract with America?"Hitler wasn't the epithet the dems used,"Newt Gingrich" was the word.
15 posted on 11/23/2003 12:29:48 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
-The lies of Paul Krugman-( BLAIR, BRAGG, DOWD ... KRUGMAN? ) --
16 posted on 11/23/2003 12:37:27 PM PST by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
No difference at all between Michael Moore and Paul Krugman.
17 posted on 11/23/2003 1:36:20 PM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Dornan was so busy running for President he didn't bother to campaign in his district. How this is Newt's fault is beyond me!

If I had to choose between Newt and Dornan, I'd take Newt any time.

Dornan never missed an opportunity to bash the first President Bush and his gadfly behaviour is revolting to me.

18 posted on 11/23/2003 1:39:10 PM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Dornan was so busy running for President he didn't bother to campaign in his district. How this is Newt's fault is beyond me

What Newt could have done about California election fraud is beyond me too.

19 posted on 11/23/2003 1:46:16 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Newt didn't push an investigation into the fraud in California. Come to think of it, they never pushed to investigate the Landrieu fraud either.
20 posted on 11/23/2003 1:53:31 PM PST by Bogey78O (No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson