[Sabertooth]

If you can't publish the name of the accussing victim then the name of the accused can be published either. I think it is only fair way around facing your accuser clause. Forget jackson, the false accusation is enough to destroy a life.

Sexual predators of the world applaud your stance. Kudos.

[cajungirl]

Ditto,,people who promote the naming of children who have been abused creep me out. Makes me wonder about them.

[longtermmemmory]

Its not an issue of predators. I believe during the pendancy of the case it is not unreasonable to keep the person who is not found guilty on the same publicity footing as the accuser. Only during the pendency of the case. AFTER a guilty finding OR the plea bargain, then the issue is different. The victin SHOULD remain confidential and the CONVICTED (or negotiated plea) person should be known.

I am thinking of divorce cases where accusations are a matter of course and as part of that matter of course exposed as false.