To: BluH2o
He's not a polarizer?
The screaming nitwit lefties bark at the moon when you mention his name. You can't even point out to them that he's pushed their agenda further than Algore ever could.
On the other hand, the henhouse here on FR goes gaga over him like a rock star.
If you criticize his slightest action, they go postal.
Guess I'm the only one who finds him utterly boring.
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Try this for polarization:
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Osama bin Laden
Hans Blix
Saddam Hussein
Emperor Hirohito
Adolf Hitler
Mao Tse Tung
Now, compare George Bush with the polarizers on that list.
Doesn't rise to the same level as Time's bias, does it?
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
President Clinton brought "divide and conquer" to an art form. The country is still suffering from it.
It is the oldest political trick in the book.
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
It is not George Bush that is polarizing the country, it is the Democrat party that is pulling away from mainstream Americans, and American values. The left is just trying to take a pre-empt the accusation that Hillary and the Clintons polarized the country so greatly that the Republicans were able to win control in 2000. The left is trying to do a turn-about and claim that it is Bush who did the polarizing. It's the old divide and conquer strategy.
69 posted on
11/23/2003 9:43:12 AM PST by
Eva
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson