Millons have been arguing about it for 40 years, citing the available evidence; -- thus, it is ludicrous to insist it is "consistent" with all evidence. See my #213.
Dr. Wecht is the major critic of this theory. I'm sure that Dr. Wecht is a wonderful pathologist (as he seems to be always letting us know). And yes, the autopsy team did not do as thorough a job as they should have. I'm sure Dr. Wecht would have done a better job (again, as he always seems to be letting us know). But I think Dr. Wecht has way too much of an "emotional tie" to this case - plus books and multiple media appearances - to ever trust his opinion as unbiased or objective.
Why is it you think I should care what Wecht says?
With all due respect, the "single bullet theory" was dealt with thoroughly in "Case Closed" and in many other places. There is nothing unusual or mysterious about it. It is consistent with all the existing evidence.
Millons have been arguing about it for 40 years, citing the available evidence; -- thus, it is ludicrous to insist it is "consistent" with all evidence. See my #123.
Dr. Wecht is the major critic of this theory. I'm sure that Dr. Wecht is a wonderful pathologist (as he seems to be always letting us know). And yes, the autopsy team did not do as thorough a job as they should have. I'm sure Dr. Wecht would have done a better job (again, as he always seems to be letting us know). But I think Dr. Wecht has way too much of an "emotional tie" to this case - plus books and multiple media appearances - to ever trust his opinion as unbiased or objective.
Why is it you think I should care what Wecht says?