To: tpaine
I have yet to find anyone criticise the single bullet fact (it's not a theory) and base their criticisms on actual evidence. When the critics do mention something it is always made up and has nothing to back it.
Facts:
- The trajectories of the entrance/exit wounds line up.
- The trajectory points to the 6th floor window area of the TSBD.
- The bullet matched the rifle found in the TSBD.
- Oswald owned the rifle -- his palm prints were on it.
- Recreations of the shooting through cadavers ended up with a bullet resembling CE 399.
103 posted on
11/23/2003 11:53:16 AM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
I have yet to find anyone criticise the single bullet fact (it's not a theory) and base their criticisms on actual evidence. When the critics do mention something it is always made up and has nothing to back it.
Facts:
The trajectories of the entrance/exit wounds line up.
The trajectory points to the 6th floor window area of the TSBD.
The bullet matched the rifle found in the TSBD.
Oswald owned the rifle -- his palm prints were on it.
Recreations of the shooting through cadavers ended up with a bullet resembling CE 399.
103 -FC-
You are simply denying that hundreds of books, thousands of articles [many posted on FR], and millions of words factually counter the Reports theory.
To say:
-- "I have yet to find anyone criticise the single bullet fact (it's not a theory) and base their criticisms on actual evidence." --
--- is simply a case of not seeking.
All of your listed 'facts', [save "Oswald owned the rifle"], have been argued ad nauseum, for 40 years, and found to be questionable.
Get some new lines.
123 posted on
11/23/2003 12:50:53 PM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Rickenbacker in me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson