Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wisconsinconservative; Ohioan from Florida; msmagoo; lakey; All
Now I'm assuming that since the judge allowed the deposition to be taken that it can also be admitted in the guardianship hearing(??). Can any lawyer types answer that question?

Is the judge in question "over" Judge Greer? I believe he is. When the judge in question ruled that the deposition could go forward (the doctor answering questions as pertains to the bone scan), did the deposition taken pertain to the case before Judge Greer? (I believe so, i.e., this is the case requesting that MS be disqualified as guardian). If this is true, then, yes, this is part of the DISCLOSURES (the gathering of evidence, i.e., the doctor's testimony AND the bone scan) which will now become a part of this particular case.

43 posted on 11/22/2003 7:05:01 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: wisconsinconservative; Ohioan from Florida; msmagoo; lakey; All
Felos may still try to have those "disclosures" stricken from the record at hearing/trial by filing a "MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE."
44 posted on 11/22/2003 7:09:42 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson