[Reagan Renaissance]

When Republicans expand socialism, what does it matter who controls the House? When Republicans steal freedom or property, what does it matter who controls the House?

If this becomes law, I will not be voting for Republicans or Democrats. Socialism is unconstitutional. I will not vote for politicians who support the unconstitutional taking of freedom or property. Neither should you.

[CMClay]

Republicrats and the Democracons,
take your pick.
...Jeez, the Libertarians aren't looking so looney now. :(

[AmericaUnited]

When Republicans expand socialism, what does it matter who controls the House? When Republicans steal freedom or property, what does it matter who controls the House?

If this becomes law, I will not be voting for Republicans or Democrats.

Well I remember when Reagan (the greatest POTUS in my lifetime) was criticized again and gain by the perpetual whiner conservative class while he was in office.

Reagan was for big government because he didn't abolish one agency and even expanded some.

Reagan was a closet one worlder who packed his cabinet with same. stole freedom by the of the banking laws passed.

Reagan stole freedoms/liberties by signing certain banking secrecy laws and issuing certain executive orders.

Reagan was a socialist because of the big spending/deficits.

Etc, etc., whine, whine, whine.

The same losers who now call themselves things like "Reagan Renaissance" or "Regan Man", were the very same ones promising not to vote for Reagan the different reasons mentioned above.