Skip to comments.
Second Giant Bomb Tested at Eglin Air Force Base
TBO.com ^
| 11/22/03
| AP
Posted on 11/22/2003 3:11:14 AM PST by kattracks
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AP) - The Air Force conducted a second test Friday of the "Mother of All Bombs," officially the Massive Ordnance Air Blast. The blast occurred early Friday afternoon, Eglin spokesman Jake Swenson said. Air Force officials said the weapon detonated as planned, hit its target area and released a mushroom cloud of smoke that rose more than 10,000 feet in the air. The 21,700-pound bomb, which contains 18,700 pounds of explosives, was first tested March 11, eight days before the United States invaded Iraq.
The spring blast shook windows miles away, although some people in nearby communities said it was no louder than some other weapons tested at Eglin. There were no reports of major problems related to Friday's test.
Air Force officials said one role for the bomb is as a psychological weapon, but it has yet to be used in combat.
It is being eyed as a replacement for the 15,000-pound BLU-82, known as the "Daisy Cutter," that was used in the Vietnam War to clear jungle for helicopter landing zones. It also was dropped in the 1991 Persian Gulf War to clear minefields and more recently to blast caves believed to be hiding terrorists in Afghanistan.
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bombs; eglin; eglinafb; moab; usaf
1
posted on
11/22/2003 3:11:15 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
That's 2 successful tests. Let's call it operational!
2
posted on
11/22/2003 3:13:56 AM PST
by
Flyer
(This tag line contains 0 carbohydrates)
To: kattracks

boom
3
posted on
11/22/2003 3:14:54 AM PST
by
csvset
To: kattracks
I love the smell of MOABs in the morning.
4
posted on
11/22/2003 3:44:54 AM PST
by
tlb
We need a better delivery system than just rolling these things out the backdoor of a C-130 (like we do with daisy-cutters). Ideally, this monster should have a single-use delivery vehicle to get it right over the bad-boys' heads and let it rip.
You cannot get a C-130 over a troop concentration in daylight. It's a slow-flying humungous beast...
5
posted on
11/22/2003 3:54:08 AM PST
by
Bon mots
To: kattracks; SLB; Fred Mertz
"Air Force officials said one role for the bomb is as a psychological weapon, but it has yet to be used in combat." I say drop it on Gulbuldin Hekmatyar. Preferably on the Afghani/Pakistani border if you get my drift...
6
posted on
11/22/2003 4:23:55 AM PST
by
sauropod
("Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt")
To: csvset
looks like your typical florida thunderhead. no wonder i didn't notice it.
To: kattracks
Talking of big bombs I wonder if it would be worth bringing one of these out of retirement from WWII
"Tall Boy" (12,000lb "Battleship buster")
It spins..! It goes supersonic..! It sunk the Tirpitz!!!
or
"Grand Slam" (22,000lb "earthquake" bomb, largest used in WWII)
http://www.bismarck-class.dk/tirpitz/miscellaneous/tallboy/tallboy.html With all the discussion recently about "bunker buster" bombs I wonder if the spinning supersonic ones of WWII are just as good if not better than their modern counterparts?
8
posted on
11/22/2003 5:26:51 AM PST
by
protest1
(Big bombs sink ships!)
To: kattracks
"The Air Force conducted a second test Friday of the "Mother of All Bombs," officially the Massive Ordnance Air Blast." Why not test one in Fallujah?
To: tlb
And Moab said unto the elders of Midian, Now shall this company lick up all that are round about us, as the ox licketh up the grass of the field. And Balak the son of Zippor was king of the Moabites at that time.
Numbers 22:4 - Old Test.
10
posted on
11/22/2003 6:21:43 AM PST
by
trebb
To: protest1
I wonder if the spinning supersonic ones of WWII are just as good if not better than their modern counterparts?I'll agree with you on Muscle Cars that raw horsepower is cooler than the electronic laden puffers of today.... But in avionics, man, lethality is compounded exponentially over five decades. Putting a big explosive on target, even if you're just dropping it out of the back of a C130 based on a GPS computer is a helluva lot better than the best Norden bombsight and dumb control fins.
11
posted on
11/22/2003 6:31:21 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Bon mots
You cannot get a C-130 over a troop concentration in daylight. It's a slow-flying humungous beast the thing has fins and a GPS system- I suspect it could be dropped from 30,000 feet ~five miles away
To: kattracks
We dropped "Daisy Cutters" out the cargo doors on UH-1 (Huey) helicopters in 1969. We could come in at 1500 feet and drop it, then pull pitch and turn away in time to feel the "wave" catch us and we would "surf" it like in the ocean. It would clear a spot about large enough for several helicopters to land. Except for the tree stumps, which required pathfinders to use C-4 on each before the zone was "clear". Ahhhhh...the good times were the best of times!!!
13
posted on
11/22/2003 7:07:03 AM PST
by
FlyLow
("Arguing with a liberal is like wrestling a pig in the mud; soon you realize they like it")
To: csvset
Rummy should have had it "tested" in Iraq.
14
posted on
11/22/2003 12:11:43 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: csvset
BEAUTIFUL.
15
posted on
11/22/2003 1:00:36 PM PST
by
Darksheare
("I'm not scary, but I play it on TV!")
To: FlyLow
I feel certain your are using the term 'Daisy Cutter' in a generic fashion, due to the fact the the BLU-82 with its pallet and assorted delivery system accessories exceeds the total weight of a Huey. Due to the size of the chute canopy utilized on the DC, 1500 ft would only provide enough time for a 'streamer', hence the Huey would experience severe turbulance prior to becoming several assorted parts flying in loose formation. The SOP prior to utilizing a DC was to notify all AC below FL 15 to abandon the area, especially light fixed wing and choppers.
Thank you for your service.
To: sargunner
I feel certain your are using the term 'Daisy Cutter' in a generic fashion, due to the fact the the BLU-82 with its pallet and assorted delivery system accessories exceeds the total weight of a Huey. Due to the size of the chute canopy utilized on the DC, 1500 ft would only provide enough time for a 'streamer', hence the Huey would experience severe turbulance prior to becoming several assorted parts flying in loose formation. The SOP prior to utilizing a DC was to notify all AC below FL 15 to abandon the area, especially light fixed wing and choppers.
Absolutely generic...that monster you described was never tossed out by the ARMY.
17
posted on
11/24/2003 5:34:51 AM PST
by
FlyLow
("Arguing with a liberal is like wrestling a pig in the mud; soon you realize they like it")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson