To: ChefKeith
That's a common story in the old USSR. Their engineering was superb. Their quality absolutely stank.
7 posted on
11/22/2003 1:03:38 AM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
("Across this great nation people pray -- do not put out her flame" -- DFU. An unashamed Godsquadder)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Given the odds in the current conflict and the quanity of available ammo if I were there (Iraq) I would have picked up the 1st funcitional AK and carried BOTH My issued M-16 AND the AK.
Speaking for Myself in that situation.
As My Brother told Me "it is better to have and not need, than need and not have"
8 posted on
11/22/2003 1:10:57 AM PST by
ChefKeith
(NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
To: HiTech RedNeck
P.S. a bullet leavingg the barrel is better than one that won't even chamber...
9 posted on
11/22/2003 1:12:55 AM PST by
ChefKeith
(NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
To: HiTech RedNeck
That's a common story in the old USSR. Their engineering was superb. Their quality absolutely stank. The first circa 1947-model AK47 rifles, with stamped receivers like the German MP44/StG 44 were an abysmal failure and had to be replaced with a version built with a forged and machined receiver just like an 1880's Winchester rifle. It wasn't until 1959, after 15 years of development, that Kalishnikov's design was refined into the stamped-receiver version, the AKM.
27 posted on
11/22/2003 8:15:00 AM PST by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson