Victimised man of Europe

Here in Britain, the Istanbul bombs have provoked anguish, anger and anxiety in equal measure: anguish at the helpless suffering of the victims, anger at the pitiless cruelty of the terrorists, and anxiety at the prospect of further attacks on British targets.

Yet another emotion ought to come into play alongside anguish, anger and anxiety - solidarity. The natural tendency of any nation to look to its own should not blind us to the even more grievous blow inflicted on our Turkish allies.

Though al-Qa'eda had various ulterior motives in attacking two synagogues, a British consulate and a major international bank, in every case the great majority of casualties were Turks.

Nor was the location of these attacks accidental. Turkey, as the Muslim world's oldest and most successful experiment in secular democracy, is abominated by radical Islamists.

This unique attempt to reconcile Islam with modernity remains an exemplary model for other pro-Western governments in the Middle East, such as Egypt, Jordan or the Gulf states.

As such, its destabilisation is a high priority for al-Qa'eda, while other terrorist organisations such as Hizbollah and Hamas are hostile to Turkey because of its close relationship with Israel. Turkish governments have always co-operated well with America, which not unreasonably regards Turkey as a more loyal Nato ally than some European states.

The fact that Turkey did not participate in the overthrow of Saddam Hussein had less to do with lack of enthusiasm than with the understandable sensitivities of the Iraqi Kurds and unseemly haggling over the level of American subsidies.

Despite these minor irritations, Turkish relations with America and Britain remain good. The recent ascendancy of moderate Islamists over the secularist heirs of Atatürk has made no difference to Turkey's pro-Western policy.

This week's onslaught, which may mark the beginning of a sustained terrorist campaign, could be intended to prise Turkey away from its Anglo-American alliance.

If so, it will surely fail. Turks have uniformly reacted with horror and indignation to the terrorists' indiscriminate slaughter of fellow Muslims during the holy month of Ramadan. There is no backlash against the British or Americans among ordinary Turks; rather the contrary.

What resentment there is towards the West is directed against the European Union, which has again postponed consideration of Turkey's membership application until next year.

Jack Straw's hope that the Istanbul bombs might speed Turkey's progress looks like wishful thinking, given lingering European hostility, notably in France, dating back to the long feud between the Ottoman Empire and Christendom.

Though the impact of 70 million Turkish Muslims on Europe would be substantial, and the disparity in living standards is large, there are already large and successful Turkish communities in Britain and Germany.

A prosperous, well-integrated Turkey would pose no threat to Europe. An impoverished, excluded Turkey might fall prey to anti-Western Islamist movements.

This, then, is a moment to show solidarity with our Turkish allies. Al-Qa'eda deliberately chose to attack diplomatic, religious and commercial targets, symbols of the most cosmopolitan port in the Mediterranean.

In each of its incarnations – as Byzantium, Constantinople or Istanbul – it has been a citadel of civilisation. Istanbul, like Turkey itself, is no stranger to the barbarism that was unleashed against it this week, but this confluence of Orient and Occident, straddling Europe and Asia, will never succumb.

Turkey has chosen the Western path. That remains the right choice. Britons and Turks, Muslims, christians and Jews, have died together for a common cause: the cause of freedom.

"Turkey has chosen the Western path."

Since their elected govt is "moderate" (yeah, whatever) Islamist,and they have not provided any support at all to the US, it appears that they are at a fork in the road. They are posing as neutral for political purposes, but siding privately with more radical Islamists.

The military is completely secular, thus preventing the more radical politicians from acting out. That is why they position themselves as 'moderate' Islamists.

If France is the key to EU opposition to Turkey, it is ironic, considering that when the other Christians of Europe were in danger of being ccnquered by the Turks in the 16th century, France was friendly with the Ottoman Empire.

In keeping centuries-old fueds alive, the Euroweenies are worse than Islamofascists. A thriving, democratic Turkey is our best answer to Islamos who want to thrust the world back to the 8th century.

I've believed for years that Turkey plays a key role in the future safety of the world. So far, the people are moderates, capitalists, engaged in bettering themselves in the world. They may have a fight on their hands against extremist groups, but I'm betting on them to win.

To the contrary, the Turks behaved extremely badly in the runup to the Iraqui war. They strung us along and then deliberately stabbed us in the back. I think the French subverted them.

But things are a little better now. And it's certainly true that it's high time the EU people stopped dangling various sorts of bait in front of the Turks and cooperated with them in dealing with Islamic terrorism.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.