Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Terrell; Ispy4u
As a result of the tactic, the Iraqi provided information regarding a planned sniper attack on U.S. soldiers. Two insurgents were arrested, a third fled and there were no attacks in the area.

The arrest of the insurgents and the lack of attacks in the area may or may not be related.

If there were no attacks actually planned, the arrests accomplished nothing.

And that's the problem. Prisoners subjected to abuse will tell the interrogators what they believe the interrogator wishes to hear, not necessarily the facts.

Now, if you're one of Saddam's boys, you don't care about that. But we're not Saddam Hussein's Mukhbarat.

An untrained interrogator will tell a prisoner far more than he or she intends to--and, if dealing with a real, genuine insurgent, far more than the insurgent will ever tell the interrogator. One thing that will ineviatbly happen is that the amateur will ask leading questions that tell the prisoner what the interrogator's biases are, and what the desired answer is.

277 posted on 11/23/2003 12:19:04 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah; William Terrell
Thanks Poohbah, had to go somewhere for a while.

William Terrell, what Poohbah said.
285 posted on 11/23/2003 2:44:14 PM PST by Ispy4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson