Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: O6ret
Why is it every writer adds in their belief that Col. West was "threatening to kill" the guy?

It was obvious to me that Col. West knows his Ba'athists quite well. Whenever one of them wanted to pistol whip some poor victim they'd clear their pistol first to avoid accidentally shooting themselves.

Col. West cleared his pistol. The Ba'athist terrorist took that as a prelude to losing teeth and having a funny jawline the rest of his life, and caved!

This approach has it's counterpart with a technique used by the Spanish Inquisition ~ they'd simply direct that the "instruments of torture be displayed" to their target!

The supposed "threat" existed only in the mind of the Ba'athist. It's not likely Col. West threatened to shoot the guy ~ hey, after all, he emptied his pistol!

12 posted on 11/21/2003 4:18:05 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
The supposed "threat" existed only in the mind of the Ba'athist. It's not likely Col. West threatened to shoot the guy ~ hey, after all, he emptied his pistol!

Well, guess what?

You just defined the crime of assault, as per Article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Look up Richard Toliver's The Interrogator to see how interrogations are done. The guy profiled in the book was a German who was extremely adept at getting Allied POWs to talk and disclose all manner of extremely sensitive information. And he never threatened them in any way.

18 posted on 11/21/2003 4:27:38 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson