But the law requires that it be excluded. Do you agree with a law that would exclude extrinsic evidence that might show that the "victim" was a willing participant? Shouldn't the evidence come in and the jury make a determination as to whether it makes any difference? Aren't we interested here in getting to the truth? If so, then what purpose is served by excluding the evidence?
BTW you have been officially expelled from NOW.
Yes.
Funny how merely stating the facts gets some all riled up, though, with them making assumptions and all.