No, you didn't have it right. I went out of my way to say that all I was saying was some blood was found on his shirt and it wasn't microscopic, but I wasn't saying gallons or anything either.
I said right here :
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1026632/posts?page=167#167 **I didn't say "so much" blood, I said "as much a she did" in order to leave smears. I didn't claim it was gallons or deviate at all from what is a known fact. She bled enough to leave smears on his shirt is all I said, and I, for one, do not find that normal or usual, on its face. I'll wait for more testimony to persuade me it's more common than I think.**
FOFLOL. I will admit, you seem determined to take the facts and make them fit your opinion.
Since you're going out of your way to accomodate, will you agree that a "streak" or "smear" of blood so faint that it does not bleed through on a white T-shirt, is not much blood ? Would you also be willing to consider there is no way to determine if that blood was from a fresh tear that night or from a one that might have occured on the 27th or 28th or 29th ?