Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
I most certainly did read that testimony, and it is exactly as I represented. In fact, Mackey tries to say it wasn't enough blood to observe through the outside and he says it's "not very...", then goes on to say how the shirt was tucked in. That is exactly what I typed earlier in the thread. That he said Bryant had the shirt tucked in and he collected it without examining it and the lab saw it when they got it, and later he saw it for himself.

And nowhere does it say they had to use a microscope to see it. He says he when he did see the streaks on the shirt, when looking at the inside of the shirt you can, quote, "definitely see it".

No mention of needing a microscope at all.
373 posted on 11/21/2003 4:15:14 PM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
It doesn't say they didn't use a microscope.....and it sure as hell doesn't say it was visible to the naked eye.
384 posted on 11/21/2003 4:24:29 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson