Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strider
If the judge believed that he ought to have had the courage to dismiss the case.

IMO he was merely playing to the monied crowd that plays and pays at the ski resorts in snowy Colorado.

289 posted on 11/21/2003 2:30:44 PM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: OldFriend
"If the judge believed that he ought to have had the courage to dismiss the case."

He couldn't. The prosecution met the standard of bringing forth a case to trial by state law.

290 posted on 11/21/2003 2:32:18 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

To: OldFriend
If the judge believed that he ought to have had the courage to dismiss the case.

That's not true. The law does not allow him to look at the evidence from any other perspective that the procecutors.

He had to bind it over. Given a choice he wouldn't have.

291 posted on 11/21/2003 2:32:40 PM PST by Strider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

To: OldFriend
If the judge believed that he ought to have had the courage to dismiss the case.

The judge said the standard was that he was required to view the evidence in "the light most favorable to the prosecution" which is why he said he bound it over.

300 posted on 11/21/2003 2:38:18 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson