408-8. I wonder who the eight weasels were.
Ooops... my apologies to weasels. Unfair to them to be compared to politicians unwilling to act against terrorists.
To: zx2dragon; yonif; Alouette; SJackson; Nachum; Yehuda; veronica
ping
2 posted on
11/21/2003 9:24:33 AM PST by
anotherview
("Ignorance is the choice not to know" -Klaus Schulze)
To: anotherview
Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage agreed, saying that when Secretary of State Colin Powell visited Damascus in May "he made it very clear to President Assad and his colleagues that they had come to a fork in the road. ... They didn't choose to take the right one."Whoops, looks like they're on the road that will lead to meeting the US military.
3 posted on
11/21/2003 9:26:01 AM PST by
Lijahsbubbe
(Take my advice; I don't use it anyway.)
To: anotherview
Oh dear...it's going to "damage [our] overall standing in the Middle East". Note to Syria: the damage has been done. This is part of our "damage control".
5 posted on
11/21/2003 9:33:37 AM PST by
sarasota
To: SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; Paved Paradise; Mr. Mojo; Thinkin' Gal; Bobby777; adam_az; Alouette; ...
The House on Thursday voted 408-8 in favor of a Senate-amended version of the legislation that, at the urging of the White House, gives the president greater leeway to waive the punishment on the basis of national security. National security eh? Just like the fact President Bush continues to waive the house resolution calling for the US embassy to move to Jerusalem, and just like the President waving sanctions over the PLO terror regime, allowing their offices to remain open, and allowing it to continue to receive US aid, even though it engages in terrorism against Israelis and Americans.
6 posted on
11/21/2003 9:34:35 AM PST by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
To: anotherview
I was not able to find the congressits who voted no.
However here are the Senators who voted no:
Voting against the bill were Sens. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., Lincoln Chafee, R-R.I., Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., and James Jeffords, I-Vt.
I know nothing about Enzi, but the other 3 are a complete waste of skin and oxygen.
7 posted on
11/21/2003 9:36:08 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Sore@US, the Evil Daddy Warbucks, has owned the DemonicRats for decades!)
To: anotherview
To: anotherview
That would be HR 1828, glad to see it went through.
Another one to keep an eye on is aimed at the Saudis, S 1888.
13 posted on
11/21/2003 9:56:43 AM PST by
zx2dragon
(I could never again be an angel... Innocence, once lost, can never be regained.)
To: anotherview
BTTT.
19 posted on
11/21/2003 1:41:53 PM PST by
anotherview
("Ignorance is the choice not to know" -Klaus Schulze)
To: anotherview
U.S. deploys 20,000 troops near Syrian border WORLD TRIBUNE.COM ^ | Wednesday, November 19, 2003
Posted on 11/19/2003 1:25 PM PST by Mossad1967
The United States has deployed 20,000 troops along the Syrian border after Syria failed to stop militants from crossing into Iraq.
As late as October, U.S. officials said hundreds of Islamic insurgents were crossing into Iraqi from Syria. They said Syrian authorities had failed to respond to U.S. appeals to stop the flow of insurgents.
U.S. military officials said the U.S. troop presence was bolstered beginning in September and has resulted in a significant drop in infiltration from Syria. The U.S. troops are based in the Iraqi province of Anbar, Middle East Newsline reported.
Maj. Gen. Charles Swannack, commander of the 82nd Airborne Division, said the military completed a 200 percent increase in U.S. troops at Anbar. Swannack told a briefing in Baghdad on Tuesday that the increased deployment was also meant to stop infiltration from other Iraqi neighbors, such as Jordan and Saudi Arabia. But the U.S. presence has not halted the flow of insurgents from Syria. On Monday, the U.S. military said six suspected insurgents were captured near the Syrian border. One of them was later killed when he tried to attack a guard.
Swannack said the U.S. troop presence in Anbar has resulted in reducing the flow of insurgents from Syria. He said Islamic insurgents have launched attacks against the U.S. force near the 500-kilometer Syrian border. But he called the attacks ineffective.
"We are not fighting foreign fighters coming across the border in significant numbers," Swannack said. "We are fighting mostly former regime locals."
20 posted on
11/21/2003 4:02:15 PM PST by
Davea
To: anotherview
although Syrian officials have warned that it would damage America's overall standing in the Middle East. ?????
22 posted on
11/22/2003 12:32:11 AM PST by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson