Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EGPWS
Are you implying that you’d rather eat food that had raw human feces on it than something that was chemically fertilized?
15 posted on 11/21/2003 2:04:24 AM PST by panaxanax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: panaxanax
Are you implying that you’d rather eat food that had raw human feces on it than something that was chemically fertilized?

Not at all. What I am implying is, it doesn't matter if it's feces or chemicals. If feces were no longer allowed to be used for fertilizer, then the panic would be on chemicals in our food and possibly to the point of banning chemical fertilizers to opt for organic fertilizers.

It reminds me of coal strip mining in the '60's that was sooo awful to our environment that it no longer was an acceptable way to product energy. So we went to nuclear and then lo and behold strip mining is more acceptable because of the horrors of nuclear energy that were conveyed. Fear mongering however seems to be perpetually acceptable.

34 posted on 11/21/2003 10:06:53 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: panaxanax
Are you implying that you’d rather eat food that had raw human feces on it than something that was chemically fertilized?

The problem with eating poop from Mexico is that they have a lot of hepatitis A, pathogenic E. coli, salmonella, shigella, cholera and other diseases in that poop. If the human sewage used to fertilize doesn't contain a lot of diseases --- I guess it'd be safer to eat.

44 posted on 11/22/2003 6:16:25 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson