Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Successfully Tests Ion Engine
Spaceref ^ | 11/20/03

Posted on 11/20/2003 8:11:24 PM PST by Brett66

NASA Successfully Tests Ion Engine

NASA's Project Prometheus recently reached an important milestone with the first successful test of an engine that could lead to revolutionary propulsion capabilities for space exploration missions throughout the solar system and beyond.

The test involved a High Power Electric Propulsion (HiPEP) ion engine. The event marked the first in a series of performance tests to demonstrate new high-velocity and high- power thrust needed for use in nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) applications.

"The initial test went extremely well," said Dr. John Foster, the primary investigator of the HiPEP ion engine at NASA's Glenn Research Center (GRC), Cleveland. "The test involved the largest microwave ion thruster ever built. The use of microwaves for ionization would enable very long-life thrusters for probing the universe," he said.

The test was conducted in a vacuum chamber at GRC. The HiPEP ion engine was operated at power levels up to 12 kilowatts and over an equivalent range of exhaust velocities from 60,000 to 80,000 meters per second. The thruster is being designed to provide seven-to-ten-year lifetimes at high fuel efficiencies of more than 6,000-seconds specific impulse; a measure of how much thrust is generated per pound of fuel. This is a contrast to Space Shuttle main engines, which have a specific impulse of 460 seconds.

The HiPEP thruster operates by ionizing xenon gas with microwaves. At the rear of the engine is a pair of rectangular metal grids that are charged with 6,000 volts of electric potential. The force of this electric field exerts a strong electrostatic pull on the xenon ions, accelerating them and producing the thrust that propels the spacecraft. The rectangular shape, a departure from the cylindrical ion thrusters used before, was designed to allow for an increase in engine power and performance by means of stretching the engine. The use of microwaves should provide much longer life and ion-production capability compared to current state-of- the-art technologies.

This new class of NEP thrusters will offer substantial performance advantages over the ion engine flown on Deep Space 1 in 1999. Overall improvements include up to a factor of 10 or more in power; a factor of two to three in fuel efficiency; a factor of four to five in grid voltage; a factor of five to eight in thruster lifetime; and a 30 percent improvement in overall thruster efficiency. GRC engineers will continue testing and development of this particular thruster model, culminating in performance tests at full power levels of 25 kilowatts.

"This test represents a huge leap in demonstrating the potential for advanced ion technologies, which could propel flagship space exploration missions throughout the solar system and beyond," said Alan Newhouse, Director, Project Prometheus. "We commend the work of Glenn and the other NASA Centers supporting this ambitious program."

HiPEP is one of several candidate propulsion technologies under study by Project Prometheus for possible use on the first proposed flight mission, the Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO). Powered by a small nuclear reactor, electric thrusters would propel the JIMO spacecraft as it conducts close-range observations of Jupiter's three icy moons, Ganymede, Callisto and Europa. The three moons could contain water, and where there is water, there is the possibility of life.

Development of the HiPEP ion engine is being carried out by a team of engineers from GRC; Aerojet, Redmond, Wash.; Boeing Electron Dynamic Devices, Torrance, Calif.; Ohio Aerospace Institute, Cleveland; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo.; and the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.


TOPICS: Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: goliath; hipep; ion; ionengine; nasa; prometheus; propulsion; rocket; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: boris
You would like this thread. :-)
21 posted on 11/20/2003 8:48:10 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Hey! Wait a minute. Ion engines?! Aren't we supposed to be 40 years behind the Chinese in space technology? Why I heard they are going to put a man on the moon in our lifetime! Zowie!
22 posted on 11/20/2003 8:49:15 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I wonder what the full potential of this technology could be if we got serious and invested a couple billion a year in the development of ion propulsion

And just who would do this 'investing'? The taxpayer? Granted I think it's an interesting and cool idea, but is it something I want the government to take care of?

23 posted on 11/20/2003 8:49:41 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: unix
Let's say this engine's thrust was scalable to space shuttle power levels. If you had an specific impulse of 20,000 you would only need 1/44th the fuel to reach the same velocity.
24 posted on 11/20/2003 8:50:56 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: billbears
We've wasted almost 100 billion on the ISS, so yes, this would be a far better use of money.
26 posted on 11/20/2003 8:52:42 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
re #24

whoa..

27 posted on 11/20/2003 8:53:13 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: commish
Or 2.7% of the speed of light -- warp factor .027 Scotty. Hmm Impulse power maybe

When you put it that way....it loses some of it's pizzazz.

28 posted on 11/20/2003 8:55:55 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
So we quit wasting dollars in one place to go spend them somewhere else. Who said conservatives wanted to limit government, we've got Republicans in control!! Our waste is good waste, is that it?
29 posted on 11/20/2003 8:57:54 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: billbears
The senior prescription drug bill will cost around 400 billion, I hope your about 200 times more concerned about that.
30 posted on 11/20/2003 8:59:30 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
The Empire has a penchant for these.


31 posted on 11/20/2003 9:00:35 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Thanks for the ping.

I was just reading this article earlier tonight.
32 posted on 11/20/2003 9:05:35 PM PST by Diddley (Free Republic: An aboveground forum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: billbears
This is our purpose as a race. Out of the sea, on to the land. Into the air. Near space. Far space.

Otherwise there's no real reason for being.
33 posted on 11/20/2003 9:09:13 PM PST by Harlequin (the difference between theory and practice is bigger in practice than in theory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

Bears a spooky resemblance to the exhaust ports on the spaceship Discovery depicted so beautifully in the Kubrick's 2001

. (steely)

34 posted on 11/20/2003 9:12:36 PM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harlequin
It may be our 'purpose' as a race but it is not the 'purpose' of the national government. Unless of course you can find a valid and unchallengable reasoning for research and development, for no other reason than just to do it, by the national government in the Constitution
35 posted on 11/20/2003 9:14:16 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
The senior prescription drug bill will cost around 400 billion, I hope your about 200 times more concerned about that.

Yes I am as that is government waste as well. I remember when conservatives, a short ten years ago, blocked healthcare bills. Of course that's when more than a handful were more concerned with doing their job than gaining votes....

36 posted on 11/20/2003 9:21:11 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
BTTT
37 posted on 11/20/2003 9:25:45 PM PST by StriperSniper (The "mainstream" media is a left bank oxbow lake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Actually I want to see a hammerhead fly.

It already has.

Many hours of flight time...many hours of combat time.

Many enemy airplanes blown out of the sky.

Many rounds of 20mm heaped upon the hated enemy's head.

Lots of combat pilots that swear by it.

Like the commercial said, "takes a beating and keeps on ticking."

I am, of course, talking about the almighty - everyone take a deep breath, lower your eyes in respect - .....

The mighty F-4 Phantom / II, produced with loving care by McDonnell Douglas**.

Living proof that with enough thrust - all hail the J-79 - anything can fly.

And fly it did.

With the newer, elite machines - the F-16 and the F-15.

And did it's job. Again. Please research the Gulf War Air Op's - we be the Weasels and God knows you fear us!

This would be the "Hammerhead" to which you are referring, no?

Big....Ugly (only to those that don't know)....Fast...and...

very deadly.

**The F-15 Eagle / Strike Eagle. Another fine product from McDonnell Douglas. An updated F-4.

LVM

38 posted on 11/20/2003 9:28:35 PM PST by LasVegasMac (Thunder was his engine and White Lightning was his load....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac
That rarely happens nowadays.
39 posted on 11/20/2003 9:29:43 PM PST by Bogey78O (No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Well we'll need a workhorse if ever we want to get to mars.
40 posted on 11/20/2003 9:35:34 PM PST by Bogey78O (No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson