Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Successfully Tests Ion Engine
Spaceref ^ | 11/20/03

Posted on 11/20/2003 8:11:24 PM PST by Brett66

NASA Successfully Tests Ion Engine

NASA's Project Prometheus recently reached an important milestone with the first successful test of an engine that could lead to revolutionary propulsion capabilities for space exploration missions throughout the solar system and beyond.

The test involved a High Power Electric Propulsion (HiPEP) ion engine. The event marked the first in a series of performance tests to demonstrate new high-velocity and high- power thrust needed for use in nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) applications.

"The initial test went extremely well," said Dr. John Foster, the primary investigator of the HiPEP ion engine at NASA's Glenn Research Center (GRC), Cleveland. "The test involved the largest microwave ion thruster ever built. The use of microwaves for ionization would enable very long-life thrusters for probing the universe," he said.

The test was conducted in a vacuum chamber at GRC. The HiPEP ion engine was operated at power levels up to 12 kilowatts and over an equivalent range of exhaust velocities from 60,000 to 80,000 meters per second. The thruster is being designed to provide seven-to-ten-year lifetimes at high fuel efficiencies of more than 6,000-seconds specific impulse; a measure of how much thrust is generated per pound of fuel. This is a contrast to Space Shuttle main engines, which have a specific impulse of 460 seconds.

The HiPEP thruster operates by ionizing xenon gas with microwaves. At the rear of the engine is a pair of rectangular metal grids that are charged with 6,000 volts of electric potential. The force of this electric field exerts a strong electrostatic pull on the xenon ions, accelerating them and producing the thrust that propels the spacecraft. The rectangular shape, a departure from the cylindrical ion thrusters used before, was designed to allow for an increase in engine power and performance by means of stretching the engine. The use of microwaves should provide much longer life and ion-production capability compared to current state-of- the-art technologies.

This new class of NEP thrusters will offer substantial performance advantages over the ion engine flown on Deep Space 1 in 1999. Overall improvements include up to a factor of 10 or more in power; a factor of two to three in fuel efficiency; a factor of four to five in grid voltage; a factor of five to eight in thruster lifetime; and a 30 percent improvement in overall thruster efficiency. GRC engineers will continue testing and development of this particular thruster model, culminating in performance tests at full power levels of 25 kilowatts.

"This test represents a huge leap in demonstrating the potential for advanced ion technologies, which could propel flagship space exploration missions throughout the solar system and beyond," said Alan Newhouse, Director, Project Prometheus. "We commend the work of Glenn and the other NASA Centers supporting this ambitious program."

HiPEP is one of several candidate propulsion technologies under study by Project Prometheus for possible use on the first proposed flight mission, the Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO). Powered by a small nuclear reactor, electric thrusters would propel the JIMO spacecraft as it conducts close-range observations of Jupiter's three icy moons, Ganymede, Callisto and Europa. The three moons could contain water, and where there is water, there is the possibility of life.

Development of the HiPEP ion engine is being carried out by a team of engineers from GRC; Aerojet, Redmond, Wash.; Boeing Electron Dynamic Devices, Torrance, Calif.; Ohio Aerospace Institute, Cleveland; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo.; and the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.


TOPICS: Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: goliath; hipep; ion; ionengine; nasa; prometheus; propulsion; rocket; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 11/20/2003 8:11:24 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Space; RightWhale; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...
This new class of NEP thrusters will offer substantial performance advantages over the ion engine flown on Deep Space 1 in 1999. Overall improvements include up to a factor of 10 or more in power; a factor of two to three in fuel efficiency; a factor of four to five in grid voltage; a factor of five to eight in thruster lifetime; and a 30 percent improvement in overall thruster efficiency.

Ok, I'm impressed.

2 posted on 11/20/2003 8:12:59 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
... Ion engine?

Millennium Falcon, right around the corner.
3 posted on 11/20/2003 8:20:49 PM PST by Terpfen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Now this is cool! :-)
4 posted on 11/20/2003 8:26:53 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Cool.

I just want to be around when they say,..

"Warp Factor 1 - engage!"

NASA seems to have been overcome by that age old nemisis of too many chiefs. Hopefully, this is a step - a solid step - towards the future.

Oh yea, don't forget about that little "meter vs foot" thing this time, ok? Sheese.

LVM

5 posted on 11/20/2003 8:27:24 PM PST by LasVegasMac (Thunder was his engine and White Lightning was his load....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Millennium Falcon, right around the corner.

I'm waiting for the Ion Cannon available for home defense.. (as per Planet Hoth defense in The Empire Strikes Back)

6 posted on 11/20/2003 8:27:38 PM PST by Experiment 6-2-6 (Meega, Nala Kweesta!!!! Support Congressman Billybob! Go to www.Armorforcongress.com!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Can't wait to get me one o dem speeders and hunt me some womprats
7 posted on 11/20/2003 8:28:58 PM PST by fiscally_right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stultis; PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; longshadow; Alamo-Girl; Piltdown_Woman; Condorman; Ichneumon; ...
Cool stuff. :-)
8 posted on 11/20/2003 8:30:27 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: XBob
Do you want to ping the "list"...
9 posted on 11/20/2003 8:33:30 PM PST by tubebender (FReeRepublic...How bad have you got it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble
Ping. :-)
10 posted on 11/20/2003 8:35:49 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Thanks for the ping!
11 posted on 11/20/2003 8:36:22 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fiscally_right

Level flight low speed (100mph) test scheduled for spring :)

12 posted on 11/20/2003 8:38:36 PM PST by Axenolith (Is that crystal RED!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac
Actually I want to see a hammerhead fly.
13 posted on 11/20/2003 8:38:46 PM PST by dts32041 (Is it time to practice decimation with our representatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
exhaust velocities from 60,000 to 80,000 meters per second

Wow. That translates to 3750 to 5000 Miles per second, or a speed of 13.5 to 18 MILLION Miles per hour.

Or 2.7% of the speed of light -- warp factor .027 Scotty. Hmm Impulse power maybe

14 posted on 11/20/2003 8:39:50 PM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I wonder what the full potential of this technology could be if we got serious and invested a couple billion a year in the development of ion propulsion. Deep Space1 put out 90 millinewtons of thrust, this is putting out around .9 Newtons of thrust with an ISP of >6000. Could we get this past 10,000-20,000 ISP with around 100 Newtons of thrust? A technology definitely worth investigating.
15 posted on 11/20/2003 8:44:00 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
16 posted on 11/20/2003 8:44:38 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I wonder what the full potential of this technology could be if we got serious and invested a couple billion a year in the development of ion propulsion. Deep Space1 put out 90 millinewtons of thrust, this is putting out around .9 Newtons of thrust with an ISP of >6000. Could we get this past 10,000-20,000 ISP with around 100 Newtons of thrust? A technology definitely worth investigating.

What the hell did you just say?!

English Please?

17 posted on 11/20/2003 8:45:40 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
ping. :-)
18 posted on 11/20/2003 8:46:09 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: unix
More power! Better gas mileage!
19 posted on 11/20/2003 8:47:05 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Would be a wowser. :-)
20 posted on 11/20/2003 8:47:25 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson