Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sweetliberty
For instance, this sentence (page 17, last sentence in paragraph III. (c)):

The legislative authority to re-regulate who exercises a guardianship responsibility is the same whether that responsibility has been previously exercised by a private guardian, a public guardian, a felon or a circuit judge.

IMHO, the placement of the word "felon," immediately next to "a circuit judge," and the impact of its juxtaposition, was no accident and was not lost on these authors.

And should one argue that it was merely an "accident" in the choice of words, and their placement, then one must explain why there are other numerous attacks made against the judiciary for the several laws it has also violated in this case, as referred to in this Brief.

14 posted on 11/20/2003 8:20:37 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: nicmarlo
I'm glad they're on top it. Hopefully they can intimidate these judicial bullies into backing off.
15 posted on 11/20/2003 8:25:30 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson