Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida House Files Friend of The Court Brief ~TERRI SCHIAVO.
email | 11/20/2003 | Senator Byrd

Posted on 11/20/2003 5:03:25 PM PST by pollywog

Dear Concerned Citizen:

As you may know, the Florida House recently led the fight to help save Terri Schiavo’s life from being cut short by court-ordered dehydration and starvation.

We passed legislation, known as “Terri’s Law” to allow the Governor to issue a stay on court-ordered starvation and dehydration deaths under certain circumstances.

Like many Floridians, I believe the process failed to protect Terri Schiavo and her family. Our action helps to restore a piece of what has been taken from her family.

Unfortunately, Terri’s husband, Michael, has continued to pursue legal avenues to end Terri’s life. Terri’s case is again in courts, and the Florida House has filed a friend of the court brief defending the constitutionality of “Terri’s Law.”

I have attached the House brief for your information. Please take a minute to read our defense of “Terri’s Law”. At the following web link:

http://www.myfloridahouse.com/files/brief/index.htm

Thank your for your continued interest in this matter.

Very truly yours,

Johnnie Byrd Speaker

from Senator Byrd.


TOPICS: US: Florida
KEYWORDS: florida; schiavo; senatorbyrd; terri
Just received this email. Wouldn't hurt to contact him and encourage the house with a " Thank you".
1 posted on 11/20/2003 5:03:26 PM PST by pollywog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pollywog
Love these lines to refute the notion that a new law would conflict with prior law:

One need only review the bill filings for each Legislative session to see that the results of judicial decisions are often the starting point for making new law. Although principles of due process may protect vested rights of citizens from some effects of changes in law, as a general principle, unless past results are expressly preserved, every new law applies to everyone regardless of prior adjudications of right under previous law.

If this were not so, the Legislature would have much less work to do.

Moreover, old law would continue to bind all individuals who had previously been parties to lawsuits. No change in law could affect interests previously before a court of law.

2 posted on 11/20/2003 5:13:10 PM PST by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
BUMP
3 posted on 11/20/2003 5:26:27 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
bump
4 posted on 11/20/2003 5:50:26 PM PST by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
GOD Speed...
5 posted on 11/20/2003 6:17:58 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson