[ER_in_OC,CA]

I don't understand your question to me -- it doesn't pertain to the topic I addressed. Could you clarify?

I was responding to a person whose post was solely about the Culkin photo, in order to clarify the context of the inscription. Occasionally things "sound" perverted but aren't. In the case of the Culkin photo inscription, if one didn't know the name of his hit movie, it's likely to seem eerie or dangerous.

[jimbo123]

But don't you think it's eerie or dangerous for Whacko to have photos of bare-chested children in a secret room behind his walk-in closet? Why didn't he put those photos up in his living room?