[ChemistCat]

What do you think is the cut-off where it becomes unacceptable?

Like the age of consent, it has gone down over the years. Most of us in our thirties and older have one in our babybook, perhaps as late as age 5 or so. I didn't take any of my kids after about age 1, and I'd be very leery to do so at all now, even of a newborn. You never know about other people any more.

Naked babies are still CUTE. And toddlers too. But we know there are people who find them something other than cute, and so it's not simple anymore. :-(

Once again, we lose ground to the bad guys...we are the ones hiding behind locked doors, while they own and pervert the streets, the sidewalks, the TV, the newspapers...even our backyards and photo albums.

[longtermmemmory]

It is the intent to achieve orgasm that makes it illegal. At least illegal until the homosexuals achieve their desired change in the law.

[TechJunkYard]

Naked babies are still CUTE.

Agreed.

And toddlers too.

I remember a pic of me at two, taking a bath in a washtub on the kitchen table. My mom could be in trouble for taking such a picture today. Why? Because the guy at the drugstore has a dirty mind?

It's an invasion of privacy. One reason why film is becoming obsolete. If it's a pic of your own kids there should be no questions asked.

But if they're not your kids... someone should ask "why?"