Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mansoor Ijaz: Bin Laden in Iran
Fox

Posted on 11/20/2003 3:24:55 PM PST by Dog

Mansoor Ijaz just reported Bin Laden is in Iran as of July.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 200307; 200311; binladen; brithume; elvisbinladen; foxnews; getosama; ijaz; iran; mansoorijaz; obl; ramadan2003
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-297 next last
To: PoisedWoman
Maybe he's working in our senate?


81 posted on 11/20/2003 3:56:31 PM PST by chemicalman (Rid the country of the vast liberal conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: All
Why is Brit so glum lately?
82 posted on 11/20/2003 3:56:45 PM PST by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
For a man who has been a bureaucrat his whole life, those links are very nice.
83 posted on 11/20/2003 3:57:15 PM PST by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Bin Lasen is on Iran's western border.

Go get 'em. Now.

84 posted on 11/20/2003 3:57:26 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
The ayatollahs are just begging for a US attack. I wonder if they think it is the only way they can keep power.

That's a good point. Left the way things currently are going, the ayatollahs are bound to fall within a year or two. But perhaps they think that if they can somehow provoke us enough to get us to engage them militarily (and possibly stretch our forces too thin), that would throw a measure of unpredictability into the situation that would be favorable to them. .....banking on a regional "holy" war. Either way they must know they're screwed, so why not provoke war and see what happens?

85 posted on 11/20/2003 3:58:51 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Even if Saddam's role was limited to assistance and support activities for Al-Qaeda, as far as I'm concerned he's involved in 9-11.

I've had it with the mediots and their "experts" telling me what to think. Their credibility dried up after 9-11 when our troops got bogged down in the deep Afghan snows and chewed up by the crack Taliban guerillas, and then even worse our troops died by the tens of thousands in the bloody seige of Baghdad. Not.

86 posted on 11/20/2003 4:00:08 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Either that, or the Iranian government will give up Omar and/or Osama to try and back Washington off a bit. Sort of the Islamic equivalent of "Yo, Guido, why don't me and youse go for a little ride..."

}:-)4
87 posted on 11/20/2003 4:00:45 PM PST by Moose4 ("The road goes on forever, and the party never ends." --Robert Earl Keen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem
There are several factions in the Iranian gov fighting each other for power. I would guess someone in one of those factions is talking.
88 posted on 11/20/2003 4:01:45 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
Why is Brit so glum lately?

Maybe because Fox News is turning into tabloid TV.

89 posted on 11/20/2003 4:01:45 PM PST by RightWingMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Our enemies keep making this mistake..

Axis of evil... they WERE warned, after all.

90 posted on 11/20/2003 4:02:29 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I hope GW has the fortitude to start the ball rolling for a run up to giving IRAN an ultimatum. I realize we are talking BIG TIME decisions here BUT if that is where Bin Ladin is and WE KNOW IT FOR SURE, we have NO CHOICE IMHO.
91 posted on 11/20/2003 4:03:33 PM PST by PISANO (God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE-They will not falter-They will NOT FAIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badaboom
I've had a little pet theory on the back-burner recently that it was actually Iran that sent the anthrax. Why? Well, we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and we never got hit. So the people that did it are the ones we are too afraid to hit.
Is this over simple thinking?

It's simply repackaging of the laughably silly old theory that Iraq was behind the anthrax and we won't say so because of blackmail; which really doesn't look too good considering we invaded Iraq and deposed Saddam.

Do you SERIOUSLY believe that Bush, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld et al. would genuinely not attack a country that they knew or suspected had sent the anthrax because they feared what that country would do to us?

92 posted on 11/20/2003 4:03:45 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
Yep, that's quite possible. The next few weeks should be interesting. But even if we back off completely (after excepting their "gifts"), they can't hide from the revolutionaries within their borders forever. The ayatollahs' days are numbered no matter how one slices it.
93 posted on 11/20/2003 4:05:04 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: John H K
What if the the country we suspect of sending the anthrax....has nukes?
94 posted on 11/20/2003 4:05:33 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
excepting = accepting
95 posted on 11/20/2003 4:05:36 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I would guess someone in one of those factions is talking.

And not necessarily telling the truth, either. If you want the government overthrown/attacked in any given country, what better way to do it then claim the government is harboring Bin Laden?

96 posted on 11/20/2003 4:05:37 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Dog
was manzoor wearing a dress again?
97 posted on 11/20/2003 4:05:50 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John H K
By all means. America should quiver and fear before such a threat, and WAIT forever, while Iran adds nuclear weapons to their biological weapons.

The plan of least resistance, that'll work! :)
98 posted on 11/20/2003 4:06:06 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Dog
What if the the country we suspect of sending the anthrax....has nukes?

I don't know about President Bush, but I'd preempt them.

99 posted on 11/20/2003 4:06:35 PM PST by steveegg (Property tax freeze? Since Craps Doyle vetoed, RECALL - countdown is now 40 days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: StrictTime
Because Clinton didn't invest in intelligence source creation-- moles and the like. It's too late to develop it to catch OBL.
100 posted on 11/20/2003 4:06:48 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("We happy because when we switch on the TV you never see Saddam Hussein. That's a big happy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson