Skip to comments.
Mansoor Ijaz: Bin Laden in Iran
Fox
Posted on 11/20/2003 3:24:55 PM PST by Dog
Mansoor Ijaz just reported Bin Laden is in Iran as of July.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 200307; 200311; binladen; brithume; elvisbinladen; foxnews; getosama; ijaz; iran; mansoorijaz; obl; ramadan2003
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 281-297 next last
To: PoisedWoman
Maybe he's working in our senate?
81
posted on
11/20/2003 3:56:31 PM PST
by
chemicalman
(Rid the country of the vast liberal conspiracy)
To: All
Why is Brit so glum lately?
To: chemicalman
For a man who has been a bureaucrat his whole life, those links are very nice.
To: Dog
Bin Lasen is on Iran's western border.Go get 'em. Now.
84
posted on
11/20/2003 3:57:26 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: MediaMole
The ayatollahs are just begging for a US attack. I wonder if they think it is the only way they can keep power. That's a good point. Left the way things currently are going, the ayatollahs are bound to fall within a year or two. But perhaps they think that if they can somehow provoke us enough to get us to engage them militarily (and possibly stretch our forces too thin), that would throw a measure of unpredictability into the situation that would be favorable to them. .....banking on a regional "holy" war. Either way they must know they're screwed, so why not provoke war and see what happens?
85
posted on
11/20/2003 3:58:51 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Smogger
Even if Saddam's role was limited to assistance and support activities for Al-Qaeda, as far as I'm concerned he's involved in 9-11.
I've had it with the mediots and their "experts" telling me what to think. Their credibility dried up after 9-11 when our troops got bogged down in the deep Afghan snows and chewed up by the crack Taliban guerillas, and then even worse our troops died by the tens of thousands in the bloody seige of Baghdad. Not.
86
posted on
11/20/2003 4:00:08 PM PST
by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
To: Mr. Mojo
Either that, or the Iranian government will give up Omar and/or Osama to try and back Washington off a bit. Sort of the Islamic equivalent of "Yo, Guido, why don't me and youse go for a little ride..."
}:-)4
87
posted on
11/20/2003 4:00:45 PM PST
by
Moose4
("The road goes on forever, and the party never ends." --Robert Earl Keen)
To: Ex-Dem
There are several factions in the Iranian gov fighting each other for power. I would guess someone in one of those factions is talking.
88
posted on
11/20/2003 4:01:45 PM PST
by
Dog
To: republicanwizard
Why is Brit so glum lately? Maybe because Fox News is turning into tabloid TV.
To: Dog
Our enemies keep making this mistake.. Axis of evil... they WERE warned, after all.
90
posted on
11/20/2003 4:02:29 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: Dog
I hope GW has the fortitude to start the ball rolling for a run up to giving IRAN an ultimatum. I realize we are talking BIG TIME decisions here BUT if that is where Bin Ladin is and WE KNOW IT FOR SURE, we have NO CHOICE IMHO.
91
posted on
11/20/2003 4:03:33 PM PST
by
PISANO
(God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE-They will not falter-They will NOT FAIL)
To: Badabing Badaboom
I've had a little pet theory on the back-burner recently that it was actually Iran that sent the anthrax. Why? Well, we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and we never got hit. So the people that did it are the ones we are too afraid to hit.Is this over simple thinking?
It's simply repackaging of the laughably silly old theory that Iraq was behind the anthrax and we won't say so because of blackmail; which really doesn't look too good considering we invaded Iraq and deposed Saddam.
Do you SERIOUSLY believe that Bush, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld et al. would genuinely not attack a country that they knew or suspected had sent the anthrax because they feared what that country would do to us?
92
posted on
11/20/2003 4:03:45 PM PST
by
John H K
To: Moose4
Yep, that's quite possible. The next few weeks should be interesting. But even if we back off completely (after excepting their "gifts"), they can't hide from the revolutionaries within their borders forever. The ayatollahs' days are numbered no matter how one slices it.
93
posted on
11/20/2003 4:05:04 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: John H K
What if the the country we suspect of sending the anthrax....has nukes?
94
posted on
11/20/2003 4:05:33 PM PST
by
Dog
To: Mr. Mojo
excepting = accepting
95
posted on
11/20/2003 4:05:36 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Dog
I would guess someone in one of those factions is talking.
And not necessarily telling the truth, either. If you want the government overthrown/attacked in any given country, what better way to do it then claim the government is harboring Bin Laden?
96
posted on
11/20/2003 4:05:37 PM PST
by
John H K
To: Dog
was manzoor wearing a dress again?
To: John H K
By all means. America should quiver and fear before such a threat, and WAIT forever, while Iran adds nuclear weapons to their biological weapons.
The plan of least resistance, that'll work! :)
98
posted on
11/20/2003 4:06:06 PM PST
by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
To: Dog
What if the the country we suspect of sending the anthrax....has nukes? I don't know about President Bush, but I'd preempt them.
99
posted on
11/20/2003 4:06:35 PM PST
by
steveegg
(Property tax freeze? Since Craps Doyle vetoed, RECALL - countdown is now 40 days)
To: StrictTime
Because Clinton didn't invest in intelligence source creation-- moles and the like. It's too late to develop it to catch OBL.
100
posted on
11/20/2003 4:06:48 PM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("We happy because when we switch on the TV you never see Saddam Hussein. That's a big happy.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 281-297 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson