Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amerigomag
Amerigomag said: "The bonded indebtedness was approved by the legislature and Gray Davis but the bonds have not yet been sold."

The article referred to "Unsold bonds originally planned to cover the deficit from the end of the 2002-03 fiscal year" in the amount of $8.2 billion. To which bonds were they referring and, if to the $12 billion dollar "deficit bonds", why is the amount mentioned smaller by $4 billion?

29 posted on 11/20/2003 4:05:07 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
in the amount of $8.2 billion. To which bonds were they referring and, if to the $12 billion dollar "deficit bonds", why is the amount mentioned smaller by $4 billion?

Good question. Here's the short answer. The article is poorly written.

Here's the long answer.

The $12B figure referes to the maximum authorization level of the bonds - California may sell up to $12B in bonds.

The $8.2B refers to the deficit at a point in time - the structural deficit on June 30, 2003 was estimated to be $8.3B.

33 posted on 11/20/2003 4:28:00 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson