The article referred to "Unsold bonds originally planned to cover the deficit from the end of the 2002-03 fiscal year" in the amount of $8.2 billion. To which bonds were they referring and, if to the $12 billion dollar "deficit bonds", why is the amount mentioned smaller by $4 billion?
Good question. Here's the short answer. The article is poorly written.
Here's the long answer.
The $12B figure referes to the maximum authorization level of the bonds - California may sell up to $12B in bonds.
The $8.2B refers to the deficit at a point in time - the structural deficit on June 30, 2003 was estimated to be $8.3B.